Are there any PTDI logo on that plane?Another footage from Boramae.
Not until we improve S60 to be satellite killer.
Latest Thread
Are there any PTDI logo on that plane?Another footage from Boramae.
Not until we improve S60 to be satellite killer.
I feel you man, I hope all this future cooperation ith Franco can have much better result then beforeCan you feel that?
Puting beliung about to come...
ya, "space force"? well we can always offer our huge air space area for their future satelite as long as we can also have some access to it for example. Win win solution?Considering that the Rafale is soon to be a done deal, the visit of the commander of the French Air and Space Force is actually for discussing or gathering inputs to build Indonesia's own space force.
Yes, I just pulled that out of my own a** a.k.a hoax
KM-SAM Block 2 is already M/LRSAM with ABM capabilities, similar to patriot PAC-3. better than NASAMS IMOShould have add more NASAMS instead.
Well, the wording of his tweet doesn't really explain whether the KM-SAM is already the preferred choice, or still one of the candidates for our air force's LR-SAM acquisition project.Should have add more NASAMS instead.
yes true, but Imo we need to purchase more NASAMS batteries first, each major cities with significant economic activity and industry as well as sensitive infrastructure must be defended by at least a battery of NASAMS for low flying cruise missile attacks.KM-SAM Block 2 is already M/LRSAM with ABM capabilities, similar to patriot PAC-3. better than NASAMS IMO
please replace those Mbah Mbah S60...yes true, but Imo we need to purchase more NASAMS batteries first, each major cities with significant economic activity and industry as well as sensitive infrastructure must be defended by at least a battery of NASAMS for low flying cruise missile attacks.
Then once we manage to build a strong low layer air defense then we could talk about BMD, again imo, we have more to fear from a cruise missile saturation attack than ballistic ones. Each of our potential foe (North and South) have amassed more cruise missile recently.
Australia Announces Plan To Procure Tomahawk And JASSM-ER.
The Australian government has announced its plan to acquire Tomahawk cruise missiles for the Royal Australian Navy’s Hobart class destroyers.www.overtdefense.com
i also wish indonesia planning to operate a balloon/aerostat based radar system like TARS that were used by singapore if we talked about preventing cruise missile, those kind of thing might help to detect cruise missile during it's low altitude flight/terrain hugging phase.yes true, but Imo we need to purchase more NASAMS batteries first, each major cities with significant economic activity and industry as well as sensitive infrastructure must be defended by at least a battery of NASAMS for low flying cruise missile attacks.
Then once we manage to build a strong low layer air defense then we could talk about BMD, again imo, we have more to fear from a cruise missile saturation attack than ballistic ones. Each of our potential foe (North and South) have amassed more cruise missile recently.
Australia Announces Plan To Procure Tomahawk And JASSM-ER.
The Australian government has announced its plan to acquire Tomahawk cruise missiles for the Royal Australian Navy’s Hobart class destroyers.www.overtdefense.com
The confusion began when long ago someone has forgotten to write "CE" after the year number... Thus, theI mean we're in 2022
Well thats what happen if you talking to your self?What is it with this Indos guy? Instead of discussing it in that "particular forum" he goes ranting at PDF forum.
Well you can guess which "particular forum" he was referring to.
The locations of our AFBs are well known and already on the list of potential first strike targets should there be a dramatic escalation of conflict - which nobody can guarantee will not happen in the next five years or so. Therefore, I can see the reasoning behind the air force's attempt to acquire ABM capability to protect at least some of our most strategically located bases even though our MR-SAM coverage is still laughably pathetic.While MERAD air defense which belongs to the air force should've do follow up order for more NASAMS, at the minimal another 2-3 battery should be secured for purchase. For a country our size 10-20 battery is a must. Only then BMD capable missile in the terminal phase must be acquisitioned.
There's only 3 countries in Asia Pacific with BMs capable of reaching our land, while there's 7 countries around us which is capable of cratering our airbase with their cruise missiles. We need a rational sense of urgency here.The locations of our AFBs are well known and already on the list of potential first strike targets should there be a dramatic escalation of conflict - which nobody can guarantee will not happen in the next five years or so. Therefore, I can see the reasoning behind the air force's attempt to acquire ABM capability to protect at least some of our most strategically located bases even though our MR-SAM coverage is still laughably pathetic.
Besides, it seems that TNI-AU is not looking for a "pure" ABM like THAAD, for example. What they want is an LR-SAM system that can do both jobs that NASAMS can not.
Even our radar coverage is still lacking and there is still a lot of blind spot, at least we will get quite significant number of new GCI radar.Therefore, I can see the reasoning behind the air force's attempt to acquire ABM capability to protect at least some of our most strategically located bases even though our MR-SAM coverage is still laughably pathetic.
I should've phrased it better. What I meant was that THAAD is optimized for an anti-ballistic missile role with a hit-to-kill approach using kinetic energy - hence it likely won't be much effective against aircraft or cruise missiles.There's no such thing as pure ABM
If we're talking about intercepting SRBM/MRBM, wasn't it the main idea behind the ABM interception capability of the SAMP/T and KM-SAM? Speaking of which, aren't they also capable to take down cruise missiles as well? All those, in addition to their "traditional role" of aircraft interception, may very well be what the air force is really after.none of which are capable to be intercepted in its terminal phase by ABM system on offerings.
Replying here since this thread is more suited for the topic.Correct.
But the right term is assembly, not manufacture. Afaik, we only got the right to manufacture the wing.
I don't know if we will do final assembly in Indonesia like how PT DI did it with CN-235 and heli Panther and doing the final installation, or we will send the wing to Korea and they'll do the final assembly & installation and fly the fully finished plane to Indonesia.
If it's the former where we can do the final installation of software, hardware, troubleshooting etc. in Indonesia like how PT DI did it with CN-235 & heli Panther, then it's really huge and the $2B research cost is worth the money. But if it's the latter where we can only manufacture the wing, then it's not really worth it.