My bad. I thought he is meeting another foreign minister.There is nothing wrong there as Hakan Fidan is Minister of Foreign Affairs while Enver İbrahim is Prime Minister which is higher in hierarchy.
My bad. I thought he is meeting another foreign minister.There is nothing wrong there as Hakan Fidan is Minister of Foreign Affairs while Enver İbrahim is Prime Minister which is higher in hierarchy.
I dont see any anormality , very modest and their leadet had Turkish flag in its right while their own in his left
Or they use british style when left is priority used .
Can you explain whats the problem here.I didnt like how they greeted Hakan Fidan. Theit foreighn minister made him sit in a different seat than his(kinda receieved as showing himself higher which is funny). Their king also had some nose up attitude(which i first thought its a king so they might have such things built up for years naturally).
But i believe Turkey will try not to sell them high tech stuff anymore, but i saw that Turkey didnt even care about it so there are something that i might missunderstood
Anybody could explain this attitude?
I didnt like how they greeted Hakan Fidan. Theit foreighn minister made him sit in a different seat than his(kinda receieved as showing himself higher which is funny). Their king also had some nose up attitude(which i first thought its a king so they might have such things built up for years naturally).
But i believe Turkey will try not to sell them high tech stuff anymore, but i saw that Turkey didnt even care about it so there are something that i might missunderstood
Anybody could explain this attitude?
Mostly we handle our problems with our neighbours include philipines through talk.I didnt like how they greeted Hakan Fidan. Theit foreighn minister made him sit in a different seat than his(kinda receieved as showing himself higher which is funny). Their king also had some nose up attitude(which i first thought its a king so they might have such things built up for years naturally).
But i believe Turkey will try not to sell them high tech stuff anymore, but i saw that Turkey didnt even care about it so there are something that i might missunderstood
Anybody could explain this attitude?
Mostly we handle our problems with our neighbours include philipines through talk.
For decades,there are no wars between neighbours in ASEAN.
We mostly negotiate peacefully instead of guns.
Palestine shows what a shitty Muslim country it is by siding with Armenia against Azerbaijan.
Their attitude towards the TRNC is no different from their attitude towards Azerbaijan. The current Palestinian political structure is made up of puppets. Behind the friendly rhetoric against Turkiye, there is the disproportionate political support we provide and the flow of humanitarian and social aid, mostly supported by state institutions. The minor reason has to do with the sociology of the Palestinian society around world and inside. However, when it comes to political action beyond lipservice, a clash of discourse and action is inevitable. For these very reasons, sympathy for the political leadership in Palestine is at an all-time low.
I don't see the issue here and it's normal government international politics . Israel support Azerbaijan & Palestine support Armenia . the same with Turkey and Ukraine & Russia with Al Assad .
But me personally don't support the approach of the Palestinian government towards Azerbaijan due to moral subject.
TRNC is just a copy paste of Taiwan and Turkey reasons of not recognizing Taiwan are the same reasons of Palestine not recognizing TRNC.
It's not the same thing. It is the same thing if Türkiye supports Israel to destroy Palestine.I don't see the issue here and it's normal government international politics . Israel support Azerbaijan & Palestine support Armenia . the same with Turkey and Ukraine & Russia with Al Assad .
But me personally don't support the approach of the Palestinian government towards Azerbaijan due to moral subject.
TRNC is just a copy paste of Taiwan and Turkey reasons of not recognizing Taiwan are the same reasons of Palestine not recognizing TRNC.
It's not the same thing. It is the same thing if Türkiye supports Israel to destroy Palestine.
How? Do you like it, do you want it?
From your point of view, it's fine.
Then there should be no problem for Türkiye and Turks. We should not interfere in these affairs.
Iran's use of Azerbaijan's relations with Israel to attack and threaten Azerbaijan is nothing but a superficial and ridiculous excuse for anyone who knows Iranians and Iran's modern history. Iran is Anti-Azerbaijan to its core as part of its dna. They helped Armenians in the first Karabakh war when there was no Israeli-Azerbaijani cooperation to begin with as the Azerbaijan Republic was just starting to take root.@Rooxbar
I totally agree with your post. It is a stupidity to not use your enemy's enemy massive resources and in case of Azerbaijan it will be dumb to side for Palestine and gain nothing and ignore Israel and lose everything .
Let us put Palestine-Israel issue aside please because what I am saying has nothing to do with it, it's also stupidity for Azerbaijan to not calculate the risk of siding with Israel over Iran and be a toy in the hands of Israel against Iran. all what you have mentioned is the hard truth and Azerbaijan can use that for the long run.
But let me ask you a question, What if Iran got pushed to the edge and decided in invade Azerbaijan in a blink of an eye with all it's power in a Blitzkrieg war scenario. within this few hours what would israel do for Azerbaijan ?
Palestine shows what a shitty Muslim country it is by siding with Armenia against Azerbaijan.
This enmity of Arabs against Turks and Turkiye seems to be ingrained in their blood and minds.
We should keep in mind, today international relations between Modern Nation States (to put it mildly) are very complicated.
And these relations are based on political, economic and security interests and long term calculations.
They are certainly not a product of reactionary emotions running through someone's veins or mind.
Nor they are determined by historical grievance or emotional baggages.
Otherwise, if we follow through with the same logic with your own country, (Türkiye itself) there are will be absurd and very unpleasant conclusions.
If we say Türkiye, KSA and Indoensia unconditionally supported Pakistani military stablishment when they were carrying out a semi genocide or at least an illegal and brutal in Bangladesh, resulting in death of hundreds of thousands of Banglali people in 1971.
(And Türkyie in particular, sent or were planning to sent lethal weapon to West Pakistani military's war aid and didn't even recognized BD until 1974)
Thus, (to use your own language) if we say, 'enmity and hatred between us are ingrained in our blood and minds, and we can never be friend or allies' How do you think it would've been worked out between BD and Türkyie or other above mentioned countries?
Instead, by putting what past in the past our countries are allies and moving toward developing strategic security relation.
Last but not the least, the support and sympathy for the Palestinian cause is for moral and socio-cultural reasons, not to validate their highly corrupt and puppet political leadership who most of the time don't know what they are doing, nor do they legally represent the people of Palestines.
I understand Palestinians simping for Turkiye due to Islam.
I also understand Turks simping for Palestine because majority of Palestinians are Muslims.
I know a lot of people tend to ignore the influence of religion in peoples daily lives.
Catholics will always support Catholics and Orthodox Christians will always back their own.
Jews will always back their own.
Muslims are no different in this regard.
Some people love to push a racist agenda when Turks support Palestine by calling them Arab lovers the otherside of Palestinians mainly leftists and Christians condemning Muslim Palestinians because they back Turkiye by calling them Turk puppets or Erdogan lovers.
Its so childish lmao
I've lived in Iran for many years and speak Farsi like a mother tongue. Iran's use of Azerbaijan's relations with Israel to attack and threaten Azerbaijan is nothing but a superficial and ridiculous excuse for anyone who knows Iranians and Iran's modern history. Iran is Anti-Azerbaijan to its core as part of its dna. They helped Armenians in the first Karabakh war when there was no Israeli-Azerbaijani cooperation to begin with as the Azerbaijan Republic was just starting to take root.
If you don't believe me here is one of the prominent founding members of Hizbullah explaining it:
They also left Azerbaijan to be invaded by Jilo Assyrian-Armenian gangs during the first world war in cooperation with the English (that occupation was only broken due to Enver Paşa and Nuri Paşa's İslam Kafkas Ordusu). So Iran cannot be pushed to the edge because of Azerbaijan's relations with Israel, because that's not their problem with Azerbaijan. Most of Iran's sanction-avoidance mechanisms work through Dubai. UAE has the same level of relations with Israel if not more. I don't see them severing their economic relations with UAE citing their relations with Israel. Iran started threatening and attacking Azerbaijan when Azerbaijan blocked their use of Karabakh as the grey zone of IRGC's narcotic trade to Europe. That's the only issue at hand here, because Azerbaijan had the same amount of relations with Israel before the Karabakh war as well, and Iran seemed to be perfectly fine with that, aside from marginal squeaks here and there.
Why nobody mentions the Jewish Azerbaijani's and their role in the Azerbaijan-Israel relationship.I've lived in Iran for many years and speak Farsi like a mother tongue. Iran's use of Azerbaijan's relations with Israel to attack and threaten Azerbaijan is nothing but a superficial and ridiculous excuse for anyone who knows Iranians and Iran's modern history. Iran is Anti-Azerbaijan to its core as part of its dna. They helped Armenians in the first Karabakh war when there was no Israeli-Azerbaijani cooperation to begin with as the Azerbaijan Republic was just starting to take root.
If you don't believe me here is one of the prominent founding members of Hizbullah explaining it:
They also left Azerbaijan to be invaded by Jilo Assyrian-Armenian gangs during the first world war in cooperation with the English (that occupation was only broken due to Enver Paşa and Nuri Paşa's İslam Kafkas Ordusu). So Iran cannot be pushed to the edge because of Azerbaijan's relations with Israel, because that's not their problem with Azerbaijan. Most of Iran's sanction-avoidance mechanisms work through Dubai. UAE has the same level of relations with Israel if not more. I don't see them severing their economic relations with UAE citing their relations with Israel. Iran started threatening and attacking Azerbaijan when Azerbaijan blocked their use of Karabakh as the grey zone of IRGC's narcotic trade to Europe. That's the only issue at hand here, because Azerbaijan had the same amount of relations with Israel before the Karabakh war as well, and Iran seemed to be perfectly fine with that, aside from marginal squeaks here and there.