You mean like todays Israeli's? Claiming that Palestine belongs to them, making false claims, calling theirselves the Chosen People, while 90% of them are coming from Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Russia and have no historical connection with the MENA-region.
You mean like Palestine always belongs to the Palestinians?
This is called: Western hypocrisy.
Israel/Palestine doesnt get the same treatment as Russia/Ukraine.
Are we sure that this Scott guy is not Gary's burner account or something...
Only thing missing is him posting Mariupol construction videos and women riding bicycles on the newly paved streets.
Yes, exactly like them.
Yes, a country belongs to the people that inhabit it. What a novel concept that is…
And your posts are called Scott Summers’ hipocrisy than. Because you don’t treat the Russia/Ukraine conflict the same as the Israel/Palestinian one, which is the definition of hypocrisy. But I guess you think that your hypocrisy is excused by someone else’s hypocrisy…
No mate. Macedonia was newer Greek. Ancient Hellens called Macedonians "barbarians"...He was from the ancient Greek Kingdom of Macedonia. Ancient Macedonians were just as Greek as ancient Athenians, Spartans, Corinthians, etc. They spoke the ancient Greek language, wrote with Greek alphabet and were part of the Hellenistic culture. His teacher was Aristotle and his mother was named Olympias. You can’t get any more Greek than that. Are you going to claim now that Aristotle was not Greek as well? How far can delusion go?
Ironic, isn't it, that there were Jews living for centuries in the area of what is now recognised as Israel. Following your logic, that land can only ever be Jewish. Of course, that does require you to ignore all the other peoples who inhabited the area over the centuries otherwise it could only ever be Jewish and at the same time only ever be Arab and at the same time only ever be... etc etcRussia has every right to defend herself. I hope they will defeat the Ukrainian terrorists. Russian people lived in Ukraine for centuries so that land can never be Ukrainian.
No mate. Macedonia was newer Greek. Ancient Hellens called Macedonians "barbarians"...
I friendly suggest to you to research a litlle:
Ethnicity of Ancient Macedonians
Ironic, isn't it, that there were Jews living for centuries in the area of what is now recognised as Israel. Following your logic, that land can only ever be Jewish. Of course, that does require you to ignore all the other peoples who inhabited the area over the centuries otherwise it could only ever be Jewish and at the same time only ever be Arab and at the same time only ever be... etc etc
You seem to have missed the boolean logic in what I wrote.It was irony to show the dubble agenda in both conflicts. And all you Westerners just ate it.
If Israel is right, than Russia is also right.
If the Ukrainians are freedomfighters and not terrorists, than the Palestinians are also freedomfighters.
You are all Piers Morgan's here. No difference.
Yes, we were offtopic but still you are wrong. It is not my fault if truth hurts you. Macedonians newer was Greeks and Alexandar the Great was Macedonian, not Greek. He is also called Alexander the Macedonian and not Alexander the Greek. And please be more polite and tolerant to other forum members.You are just promoting propagandistic websites that try to rewrite history. The delusion is strong with you, so I won’t waste my time anymore debating you, especially since this is also off topic here.
Well, it seems that Ukraine is already on the path of doom and the US is trying to prepare the masses for such an incidentDo you see now that there is no winning for ukraine with the weapons it has from the ''West''?
if the US wanted Ukraine to win,it would have giving weapons making it able to win it.
The US is just making sure Ukraine doesnt get overrun by Russia.
Yes, we were offtopic but still you are wrong. It is not my fault if truth hurts you. Macedonians newer was Greeks and Alexandar the Great was Macedonian, not Greek. He is also called Alexander the Macedonian and not Alexander the Greek. And please be more polite and tolerant to other forum members.
Hard to say. Here's what we know:I wonder how many F-16 are operating in Ukraine now.
Ukraine has officially received a fresh batch of F-16 jets
A new batch of F-16 fighter jets has been received by Ukraine after Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Breckelmans announced it through his official account.bulgarianmilitary.com
I wonder if there are any dogfights going on nowadays . Or any f16 were in the range of su57. Or Su57s get in close vicinity of the disputed areas.Hard to say. Here's what we know:
In total 79 are currently promised:
Denmark - 19 (some already delivered)
Netherlands - 24 (some already delivered)
Norway - 6
Belgium - 30
- Denmark promised to send a second batch by the end of 2024
- Netherlands promised to deliver the remainder of the promised 24 aircraft in the coming months
- Norway promised the first F-16s by the end of 2024
- Belgium promised to send the first batch by the end of 2024, but overall their deliveries will stretch until 2028 (depending on the rate at which Belgium receives F-35s).
I would estimate there are less than 15 F-16s in Ukraine currently.
Certainly not. Both Russian and Ukrainian planes stay far away from the front due to air defenses.I wonder if there are any dogfights going on nowadays . Or any f16 were in the range of su57. Or Su57s get in close vicinity of the disputed areas.
Then what is the point of having gen5 fighters for Russia?Certainly not. Both Russian and Ukrainian planes stay far away from the front due to air defenses.
Russia's average daily casualty count hit 1,271 in September, the U.K. Ministry of Defence said on Monday
Ukraine's F-16s are mainly used for air defense for now. Russia's meanwhile are primarily used for launching glide bombs and missiles.Then what is the point of having gen5 fighters for Russia?
What is the aim with f16s for Ukraine?