TR Navy Navy|News & Discussions

MonteCarlo

Active member
Messages
97
Reactions
5 330
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
- 41 Naval vessel are being actively constructed (37 for Navy and 4 for Coast guard). 9 new constructions will start in short duration
- A LCT Bayraktar class delivered and another started acceptance trials
- UAVs have been inducted to the Navy and has conducted strikes on USVs
- 5 types of USVs and 2 types of kamikaze USVs have been inducted to the Navy
- Sub atmaca/akata(he says Atmaca that is used against Coastal targets from submarimes instead of designated name but not much room for interpretation) is inducted to the navy
- Akya Heavy Torpedo is inducted to the navy
- Malaman Smart Bottom Mine in inducted to the Navy
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
647
Reactions
11 1,189
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
- 41 Naval vessel are being actively constructed (37 for Navy and 4 for Coast guard). 9 new constructions will start in short duration
- UAVs have been inducted to the Navy and has conducted strikes on USVs
- 5 types of USVs and 2 types of kamikaze USVs have been inducted to the Navy
- Sub atmaca/akata(he says Atmaca that is used against Coastal targets from submarimes instead of designated name but not much room for interpretation) is inducted to the navy
- Akata Heavy Torpedo is inducted to the navy
- Malaman Smart Bottom Mine in inducted to the Navy
Akya Torpedo and new LST Bayraktar Class
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
647
Reactions
11 1,189
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
-Mugem continues construction
-First keel laying of Koca Tepe
-2-5 I Class frigates have been launched 6-8 construction continues
-National Mine hunter and Fast attack craft construction continues
-(New) Bayraktar Class LCT construction continues
-Milden Construction continues
-Hisar Class opv Construction continues
- 37 Navy / 4 Costguard
-9 new ships
-UAV entered service(TB3)
-5 USV in service and 2 Kamikaze USV
-Akata (Sub Atmaca) In service (can be used against land targets
-Akya Torpedo
-Malaman Mine
 

KhanOfEurasia

Contributor
Messages
542
Reactions
6 1,234
Website
strategicreviewturkey.blogspot.com
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Germany
-Mugem continues construction
-First keel laying of Koca Tepe
-2-5 I Class frigates have been launched 6-8 construction continues
-National Mine hunter and Fast attack craft construction continues
-(New) Bayraktar Class LCT construction continues
-Milden Construction continues
-Hisar Class opv Construction continues
- 37 Navy / 4 Costguard
-9 new ships
-UAV entered service(TB3)
-5 USV in service and 2 Kamikaze USV
-Akata (Sub Atmaca) In service (can be used against land targets
-Akya Torpedo
-Malaman Mine


We still nothing heared that Barbaros Land Batteries entered in Service. The
- 41 Naval vessel are being actively constructed (37 for Navy and 4 for Coast guard). 9 new constructions will start in short duration
- A LCT Bayraktar class delivered and another started acceptance trials
- UAVs have been inducted to the Navy and has conducted strikes on USVs
- 5 types of USVs and 2 types of kamikaze USVs have been inducted to the Navy
- Sub atmaca/akata(he says Atmaca that is used against Coastal targets from submarimes instead of designated name but not much room for interpretation) is inducted to the navy
- Akya Heavy Torpedo is inducted to the navy
- Malaman Smart Bottom Mine in inducted to the Navy
We still nothing heared that Barbaros Land Batteries entered in Service. They are an asymetric Threat for enemy Fleets and keep them on Distance from turkish Shores.
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
647
Reactions
11 1,189
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
We still nothing heared that Barbaros Land Batteries entered in Service. The

We still nothing heared that Barbaros Land Batteries entered in Service. They are an asymetric Threat for enemy Fleets and keep them on Distance from turkish Shores.
Navy most likely doesn’t want to allocate money for that. Because the system should be ready only needs a order from the navy.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,735
Solutions
2
Reactions
141 26,496
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Anyone know if this is true?
They will start construction on the other 3 before the first one is ready.
Admiral said 'as soon as possible', yeah when it is 'possible'. That 'possible' is highly subjective term.

At the current state they have no rough estimation of the total costs or entire of the construction blocks ready in blueprints. We call it a design package. TN's shipyard should complete the design package, resolve the conflicts in the first ship and deliver it to SSB, which then will be forwarding to the shipyards that will be handling construction of three ships.

Before all of this, there is no concrete contracts with the companies that will be delivering major components and systems. The steel construction progresses and design takes shape, that's all what's happening.

Whereas it is more bitter for the aircraft carrier, there is literally nothing on ground but the ski-ramp made for test procedures and as a 'test block', no construction plan that goes beyond the fairy tales.

Same goes for Milden, the test block goes through construction phase and the rest of submarine, or complete package of the design is far from being ready for starting the prototype, the actual ship.

@Zafer you might be laughing but laugh at this; in a project where we are expecting rest of the three ships launch as soon as possible, we have no contract with the propulsion system subcontractor, as for gas turbines, it usually takes 2-3 years from order, to delivery. And propeller, shaft and gears are customized per design basis which takes 3-4 years. You might be laughing at a pool toy that can't propel itself.
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
1,188
Reactions
15 1,919
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Admiral said 'as soon as possible', yeah when it is 'possible'. That 'possible' is highly subjective term.

At the current state they have no rough estimation of the total costs or entire of the construction blocks ready in blueprints. We call it a design package. TN's shipyard should complete the design package, resolve the conflicts in the first ship and deliver it to SSB, which then will be forwarding to the shipyards that will be handling construction of three ships.

Before all of this, there is no concrete contracts with the companies that will be delivering major components and systems. The steel construction progresses and design takes shape, that's all what's happening.

Whereas it is more bitter for the aircraft carrier, there is literally nothing on ground but the ski-ramp made for test procedures and as a 'test block', no construction plan that goes beyond the fairy tales.

Same goes for Milden, the test block goes through construction phase and the rest of submarine, or complete package of the design is far from being ready for starting the prototype, the actual ship.

@Zafer you might be laughing but laugh at this; in a project where we are expecting rest of the three ships launch as soon as possible, we have no contract with the propulsion system subcontractor, as for gas turbines, it usually takes 2-3 years from order, to delivery. And propeller, shaft and gears are customized per design basis which takes 3-4 years. You might be laughing at a pool toy that can't propel itself.
Would they still go aheas and start construction of blocks to save time?
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,525
Reactions
59 21,473
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
that would not make sense... I mean the design has to be finalized before any shipyard would start or they'd face changes and other things that would make it expensive and difficult to complete. we don't want a frankenstein in our hands. something like a scope creep that just keeps making it more and more difficult to handle.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,312
Reactions
15 8,225
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Admiral said 'as soon as possible', yeah when it is 'possible'. That 'possible' is highly subjective term.

At the current state they have no rough estimation of the total costs or entire of the construction blocks ready in blueprints. We call it a design package. TN's shipyard should complete the design package, resolve the conflicts in the first ship and deliver it to SSB, which then will be forwarding to the shipyards that will be handling construction of three ships.

Before all of this, there is no concrete contracts with the companies that will be delivering major components and systems. The steel construction progresses and design takes shape, that's all what's happening.

Whereas it is more bitter for the aircraft carrier, there is literally nothing on ground but the ski-ramp made for test procedures and as a 'test block', no construction plan that goes beyond the fairy tales.

Same goes for Milden, the test block goes through construction phase and the rest of submarine, or complete package of the design is far from being ready for starting the prototype, the actual ship.

@Zafer you might be laughing but laugh at this; in a project where we are expecting rest of the three ships launch as soon as possible, we have no contract with the propulsion system subcontractor, as for gas turbines, it usually takes 2-3 years from order, to delivery. And propeller, shaft and gears are customized per design basis which takes 3-4 years. You might be laughing at a pool toy that can't propel itself.
I have no doubt TEI will come up with an engine that will be 100% homegrown, they have all the technology that goes into making them.

After your epic failure predicting TB3 not flying from Anadolu your words hold no value to the sharp minded. You are not alone in this either; some so called defence experts said it is too hard to test radars and we need test-beds and all to do this but here we are already running radars on unmanned jet fighters before long and even making kills with them. There is a clearly a pattern in this.

Same with Kaan main bulkheads, same with TOGG,

There is merit to opposing if you opposing wisely
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,735
Solutions
2
Reactions
141 26,496
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I have no doubt TEI will come up with an engine that will be 100% homegrown, they have all the technology that goes into making them.

After your epic failure predicting TB3 not flying from Anadolu your words hold no value to the sharp minded. You are not alone in this either; some so called defence experts said it is too hard to test radars and we need test-beds and all to do this but here we are already running radars on unmanned jet fighters before long and even making kills with them. There is a clearly a pattern in this.

Same with Kaan main bulkheads, same with TOGG,

There is merit to opposing if you opposing wisely
I haven't said anything regarding to TB3, for your information my words were precisely for the schedule they have claimed in the first times and how Navy was against the permanent mechanical integration of launch pulley or catapult and i was right; also with KE not ever flying from Anadolu, i was right, proudly.

Also i was right the operational limits of TB3, where it only provides ISR, an important duty for an aerial vehicle but doesn't really fulfill what the Anadolu is made for, not even getting close to take off with adequate munition for saturation.

Also i was right with the lacking integration which seemingly TB3 is not fully integrated with Advent, merely transfers some basic data through external consoles.

Also i was right with the unprepared first trials which they literally used COTS optics (cameras) and image processing boards - oh wait they still do, they rely on non-compliant components, neither fit for marine application nor military.

And yet, as of 2026 TB3 still remains onboard Anadolu 95% operated by Baykar personnel, with few Navy officers attending to the operations, and haven't prepared solid training or operations procedures handbook.

TEI will make a marine engine? When? Do you have slightest idea on the capacity of marine gas turbines running on the platforms and how far TEI is from ever developing one equivalent to that? We have just recently got the rights to produce and maintain it under license, with production being highly limited to non essential parts. Should i even get to mention the days which US has sanctioned us and TEI was definitely not capable of providing the necessary spare parts on its own.

Let alone the engine, we are far from making a propulsion system, end-to-end. Propellers are made abroad, why? Question yourself.

Nevertheless, it is your words against mine and your credibility here is near being on grounds and i am glad for not having your appreciation or approval.
 
Last edited:

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,735
Solutions
2
Reactions
141 26,496
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Would they still go aheas and start construction of blocks to save time?
Business goes on with contracts, if they do it for sake of elections; let alone accelerating, it would let the private shipyards squeeze more money out of it and stretch the timeline as they desire which eventually leading to delays.

This happened with Anadolu, we as public still don't know how much Sedef shipyard made out of some "changes" allowed in the contract.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,856
Reactions
118 17,584
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
it would let the private shipyards squeeze more money out of it and stretch the timeline as they desire which eventually leading to delays.
Maybe then we wouldn't need to offload the near completed Istifs...
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom