The Coming Global Backlash against China

Zapper

Experienced member
India Correspondent
Messages
1,718
Reactions
10 942
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
India
Helen Raleigh
Mon, December 28, 2020, 6:30 AM EST


c4326bb230ecc829661d85e0b8c54113

The following is an adapted excerpt from Helen Raleigh’s new book, Backlash: How China’s Aggression Has Backfired.
The Chinese Communist Party’s leader, Xi Jinping, is the most powerful leader in Communist China since Chairman Mao. Yet, Xi’s outward strongman image is a veneer over his inner insecurity. When he came into power in late 2012, China’s economy had slowed down from double-digit growth to single-digit growth; the mass working-age population, which had been the engine of China’s economic growth, has begun to decline. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington, D.C.–based think tank, projects that by 2030, “China will round out its thinning labor force by hiring workers from abroad.” At the same time, according to Mark Haas, a political-science professor at Duquesne University, “China alone in 2050 will have more than 329 million people over 65.” Consequently, China is expected to be the first major economy that will grow older before it achieves widespread prosperity.
Without its demographic dividend and with an aging population, China’s economic growth will further slow down at the time when the government needs to keep its growing middle class from demanding a level of political freedom matching their newfound wealth. An aging population would also force the government to allocate more national resources for elder care and social services, which means there will be fewer resources to compete against the U.S. This is probably one of the most important reasons why Xi feels that he has to abandon the so-called strategic-patience guidance issued by Deng Xiaoping, the paramount leader of China from 1978 to 1997, who instructed his comrades to bide their time and avoid any confrontation with powerful external forces until China was in a much stronger position both economically and militarily.


Xi, however, believes that China can’t afford to bide its time any longer. It must replace the liberal world order with a Sino-centric world order before China’s population becomes too old and the Chinese economy becomes too stagnant. However, rather than furthering economic reform and opening up more sectors to foreign investment and competition to strengthen its economy, Xi chose to hide China’s weaknesses and exaggerate China’s economic strengths. He emphasizes self-reliance and utilizing China’s resources to pump up “national champions,” or state-owned enterprises that could compete against global leaders in strategic sectors. Xi feels that nationalism is his new trump card, something he can use to motivate, excite, and unite a billion people all the while strengthening the CCP’s rule over them. Others say that his inward-looking nationalist policies are leading China to the very middle-income trap — in which China’s level of development stalls out before reaching the heights of other modern industrial nations — that Xi and his predecessors tried very hard to avoid.
Yet the more the Chinese economy slows down, the more Xi feels the need to project a strongman image both abroad and, especially, at home. As Wang Gungwu and Zheng Yongnian, two Chinese scholars, wrote in China and the New International Order, this dynamic has deep roots in Chinese history: “China’s internal order was so closely related to her international order that one could not long survive without the other; when the barbarians were not submissive abroad, rebels might more easily arise within. Most dynasties collapsed under the twin blows of inside disorder and outside calamity, nei luan wai huang, that is, domestic rebellion and foreign invasion.”
Xi is keenly aware that he is vulnerable to internal rebellion. He has purged more than 1.5 million government officials, military leaders, and party elites. His trade war with the U.S. is deeply unpopular inside China because it has caused economic pains such as rising unemployment, closing of factories, and the shifting of the global supply chain out of China. Xi knows very well that if he shows any signs of weakness, he may end up like his political rival, Bo Xilai — a princeling who is currently languishing in a notorious Chinese prison for high-level party officials.
In addition, Xi saw former U.S. President Obama as a “weak” leader who led a nation that was on its way to inevitable decline, which opened up an unprecedented opportunity for China. Xi also has certain milestones he wants to reach: In 2021, the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Communist Party, and in 2049, the 100th anniversary of the founding of Communist China. Xi wants to do something big to cement his place in history when he reaches these milestones. Therefore, in his mind, the era of hiding strength and biding time is over. He wants to show the world a new set of policies, actions, and attitudes that match China’s powerful status.
For a while, Xi was succeeding. Internally, he ruthlessly cracked down on religious believers, political dissenters, party officials, and business elites. He also built a mass surveillance state that turned the dystopian nightmare imagined by George Orwell’s 1984 into a reality. Internationally, he imposed his strong will on businesses and nations big and small through his signature project “One Belt and One Road.” The way Xi sees it, the more other countries become economically dependent on China, the more he can dominate them peacefully without having to use force. One commentator has observed that Xi “resembles a clenched fist. At home, he is clenching hard to assert his control. To the outside world, he is a hard-thrusting force determined to get his way.” Xi’s fist has conditioned many nations including the Western democracies to believe that China is stronger than it actually is and that China’s global dominance is inevitable. Therefore, few are willing to challenge China’s human-rights violations at home and its assertive behavior abroad.
But even the most powerful emperor can fly too close to the sun. The dissenting voices inside China are getting louder, while global backlash against China reached new heights in 2019. Then the 2020 coronavirus outbreak stripped the facade of Xi’s powerful image, revealed deep flaws within the CCP’s dictatorial political system, caused immense anger and frustration among Chinese people, brought serious detriments to China’s prestigious international image, and brought China’s seemingly unstoppable rise to a halt. As the prominent Hong Kong entrepreneur Jimmy Lai has written, “The more Mr. Xi pursues his authoritarian agenda, the more distrust he will sow at home and abroad. Far from transforming Beijing into the world’s leading superpower, his policies will instead keep China from taking its rightful place of honor in a peaceful, modern and integrated world.” Xi has misread the situation, overplayed his hand, and his aggressive policies at home and abroad have backfired, proving the saying: Those whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/coming-g...r_HZHMuqz7IACwLTrAioHHSa50Z9xI2BqXNwsKqSurjJF
 

mulj

Experienced member
Messages
1,989
Reactions
3,245
Nation of residence
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Whisfull thinking from author, has some valid points but those are non determinal for inevitable chinese world domination, this is consumer world today and the chinese are champions of production. I see that that they are building 2 or 3 air carriers at the moment so we can expect more visibile chinese presence at the world theaters, they simply outplayed western democracies whose do not have proper answer for chinese domination without root deep changes within their societes, star track borg perfectly fits.
 

Jackdaws

Experienced member
Messages
2,759
Reactions
1 1,583
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
China will continue to progress economically. Global power projection requires the ability to culturally colonize the world too. USA has done it with Hollywood, Netflix, Apple, Microsoft, Social Media etc. Soft power projection is extremely important. China almost did it with TikTok till it was banned.
 

xizhimen

Experienced member
Messages
7,391
Reactions
384
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
China will continue to progress economically. Global power projection requires the ability to culturally colonize the world too. USA has done it with Hollywood, Netflix, Apple, Microsoft, Social Media etc. Soft power projection is extremely important. China almost did it with TikTok till it was banned.
Two most powerful weapons that US possesses are US dollars and English language.
 

Jackdaws

Experienced member
Messages
2,759
Reactions
1 1,583
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
As Euro as shown as, the $ can be replaced. Yes, English is the global business language.
 

trishna_amrta

Experienced member
Messages
1,606
Reactions
1,925
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Whisfull thinking from author, has some valid points but those are non determinal for inevitable chinese world domination, this is consumer world today and the chinese are champions of production. I see that that they are building 2 or 3 air carriers at the moment so we can expect more visibile chinese presence at the world theaters, they simply outplayed western democracies whose do not have proper answer for chinese domination without root deep changes within their societes, star track borg perfectly fits.
Excellent point (y) I was about to say the same thing

China will continue to progress economically. Global power projection requires the ability to culturally colonize the world too. USA has done it with Hollywood, Netflix, Apple, Microsoft, Social Media etc. Soft power projection is extremely important. China almost did it with TikTok till it was banned.
Tik Tok hardly ever come close. US soft power projection start all the way back from the end of WW2 by Marshall Plan. Follow afterward by market penetration of US industrial & consumer goods & services to both the old world and the new states that recently gained independence post WW2. The same things were also done by Japan. So far China never come close to even what the Japanese done in terms of soft power other than in few spesific region.
 

mulj

Experienced member
Messages
1,989
Reactions
3,245
Nation of residence
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
China will continue to progress economically. Global power projection requires the ability to culturally colonize the world too. USA has done it with Hollywood, Netflix, Apple, Microsoft, Social Media etc. Soft power projection is extremely important. China almost did it with TikTok till it was banned.
Wrong assumption by my opionion when usa was conquering the world that was the recepie as the world was very low on materialistic level of societes so with some cool toys and ilusions thrown on them did the job. Todays wordl is much more informed and aware of falseness of usa rainbow songs. What world craves is some fairness in mutual relations without salting minds of opposite side as necessary price to get piece of cake. Chinese just do bussiness without any constrainsts and that works better nowerdays. People are sick of hipochrisy of heart and minds tactics.
 

Jackdaws

Experienced member
Messages
2,759
Reactions
1 1,583
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
Excellent point (y) I was about to say the same thing


Tik Tok hardly ever come close. US soft power projection start all the way back from the end of WW2 by Marshall Plan. Follow afterward by market penetration of US industrial & consumer goods & services to both the old world and the new states that recently gained independence post WW2. The same things were also done by Japan. So far China never come close to even what the Japanese done in terms of soft power other than in few spesific region.
I am saying they tried. Also US power projection predates Marshall Plan - right from the 1920s.
 

Jackdaws

Experienced member
Messages
2,759
Reactions
1 1,583
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
Wrong assumption by my opionion when usa was conquering the world that was the recepie as the world was very low on materialistic level of societes so with some cool toys and ilusions thrown on them did the job. Todays wordl is much more informed and aware of falseness of usa rainbow songs. What world craves is some fairness in mutual relations without salting minds of opposite side as necessary price to get piece of cake. Chinese just do bussiness without any constrainsts and that works better nowerdays. People are sick of hipochrisy of heart and minds tactics.
USA never conquered the world. Their only Colony as such was the Phillipines at some point.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom