View attachment 83895
Numbers are from "lost armour" and "ukrainewarspotting" both video record destruction which makes their claims more believable then "leaked databases."
What I learned.
1. Ukraine has a fuck load of MRAPS
2. MLRS from either sides are useless if your enemy has drones. Most MLRS are like 70-90km ranges. I think the survivability for MLRS would be better if the ranges were 150km-200km.
Citing "Lost Armour" on any self-respecting forum is considered bad form. This resource frequently manipulates "facts" and simply omits a great deal. Then again, omission isn't technically a lie, is it?

Yesterday, a forum member with the handle "duveil" came up with a brilliant line: "Statistics are like a bikini: what they reveal is intriguing, but what they conceal is the most important part."

Well, this Russian resource is precisely the type that hides the most important information. I’ve been familiar with it for a long time—in essence, it’s the Russian equivalent of "Oryx." However, Oryx always honestly acknowledges that the number of military equipment losses that lack documentation could be significant—and simply remains unknown.
The motto of "Lost Armour" is "Carthage must be destroyed!" In this context, "Carthage" refers to Ukraine—the country attacked by Russia. And you consider this a reliable source?
Back during the war in Karabakh, "Lost Armour"—just imagine, as early as the fifth day!—declared that the Azerbaijani "blitzkrieg" had failed!

Incidentally, some other Russian websites were claiming the exact same thing as early as the evening of the very first day of that conflict. 🫢 We all know how that turned out.
All Russian sources are controlled by a special unit of the FSB.

Need I say more, given that in Russia you can end up in prison even for a "like" on social media? I occasionally share articles from Russian military publications here, but, in reality, they are nothing more than Russian propaganda; the fact that I quote them here doesn't mean I trust them in the slightest.
As the Russians say: "Доверяй, но проверяй!"

("Trust, but verify!")