Recent content by Merzifonlu

It is stated that GüçHan will only be a technology demonstration model and will not go into mass production. And it is also stated that the design of the compressor, especially in the cold sector, will change. If this is the case, this project is starting to seem quite meaningless to me. I'm...

The certifying body (EASA) is an EU body. Even if they don't have problems with us, they are incredibly inefficient. I suggest you direct your disappointment to EASA.

I can't say anything about the missile. Unlike the turbofan engine model, the missile model on display has the dimensions of a missile capable of achieving what they claim. As for the engine, the situation is tragicomic. What they displayed was a plain F110 engine. (Not even a copy, they...

This is probably a veiled message to the USA: "If you don't sell us the F-110s, we'll copy them, and we've already copied six." But I think it contains a major technical misjudgment. Copying jet engines is harder than manufacturing the engine itself. They'll notice it during the qualification test.

Here we go. Very fishy.

TF35k no AB > LM 2500 equivalent domestic naval turbine TF35k no AB twin engine > Anka-3B TF35k AB > Hürjet-2 TF35k AB twin engine > Kaan

First of all, thank you for your reply. I disagree with your opinion. In my view, this gain isn't worth the risk. If the real aim of this policy is to constantly pressure the oil-producer Arab states, then that's another matter. Or perhaps the USA administrations is entirely composed of...

So why did the USA make a 180-degree turn from this policy? And the question I'm really curious about is: What factor remained the same that allows them to continue this policy at the same level? After all, even the Soviet Union collapsed during this time?

Actually, I was referring to the Akıncı. If it has radar and cost-effective missiles, it would be suitable for that task. Because iAkıncı can stay in the air for a relatively long time while on patrol duty.

I believe we are currently in a transitional phase in drone warfare. Within five years, we will start countering drones with drones and missiles with missiles. Then, economic sustainability in defensive warfare will begin to emerge a little bit. The current position is illogical; we're deploying...

Against USA

EASA certification with the LHTEC CTS-800 engine is expected to be completed this month. How about TEI TS-1400 engine?

There's something else that worries me. Even if those sluggish Europeans develop a single-use version of the EJ-200, what will the production speed be? If production is left to the Europeans, it will progress at a snail's pace. By the way, I'm seriously wondering why they didn't do this...

The EJ-200/230, customized for single-use applications, solves many problems at once. It would be a non-US option for the Gripen. The same goes for the Hürjet. It could even be the ultimate engine solution for the Kızılelma.

Here we go!