Breaking News Iran-Israel Tensions

"Israel: - A missile -Destruction of Iranian consulate - killed 11 people, including General/Lebanon and head of #IRGC in #Suriye , sole member of Hezbollah

Iranian: - > 170 drones + >30 cruise missiles + >120 ballistic missiles - Known times, places and destinations for the USA, Israel and regional countries. - 99 percent of them were caught outside Israel - An Arab Bedouin was injured/killed - Zero Israeli casualties (so far) - Very minor damage to a base in the desert (probably allowed to happen). The traditional Israel-Iran appointment is over."

I think more and more people are waking up this theatre, this game.

Bogeyman said:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779648513573269692

Click to expand...

Bogeyman said:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779615911235780980

Half of the ballistic missiles launched by Iran were not fired or never reached the target. Therefore, Israel and its allies were able to hit only 55 of 65 ballistic missiles. 10 ballistic missiles were hit.

Stupid guys increased Iran's success rate without knowing or understanding.
By the way, for those who will say what nonsense this is, Iran also used ballistic missiles, some of which were 20 years old, during the attack. The fact that 40-50 of them did not work or fell before reaching the target is probably due to the fact that the missiles are extremely old, not due to a production error or incompetence.

Click to expand...

It has been confirmed that a C-130 transport plane and storage areas were hit in Nevatim. So I'll have to round it up.

It was written on Wikipedia that F-35 warplanes were deployed for Nevatim air base and that this fleet was the fleet that would send Israel's nuclear weapons to the target.

Therefore, Israel and its allies defended themselves against 65 ballistic missiles yesterday. And they could only hit 50-55 of them. 10 missiles hit air bases. 7 of these were in Nevatim.

If Iran really wanted to wipe this air base off the map, 3-4 times the 65 missiles it sent yesterday would be enough. Then, the nuclear weapon-loaded F-35s, one of Israel's nuclear trinity, would be destroyed. This is no success, folks. Please don't make fun of our minds.

I

Bogeyman said:

It has been confirmed that a C-130 transport plane and storage areas were hit in Nevatim. So I'll have to round it up.

It was written on Wikipedia that F-35 warplanes were deployed for Nevatim air base and that this fleet was the fleet that would send Israel's nuclear weapons to the target.

Therefore, Israel and its allies defended themselves against 65 ballistic missiles yesterday. And they could only hit 50-55 of them. 10 missiles hit air bases. 7 of these were in Nevatim.

If Iran really wanted to wipe this air base off the map, 3-4 times the 65 missiles it sent yesterday would be enough. Then, the nuclear weapon-loaded F-35s, one of Israel's nuclear trinity, would be destroyed. This is no success, folks. Please don't make fun of our minds.

Click to expand...

Nothing was hit,Iranian propaganda showed some fires in Chile as being their 70s rocket tech hitting something.....The iranians know that they're outmatched so they'll light a useless firework every time the Israelis and Americans butcher their higher ops....and,rinse and repeat

Bogeyman said:

It has been confirmed that a C-130 transport plane and storage areas were hit in Nevatim. So I'll have to round it up.

It was written on Wikipedia that F-35 warplanes were deployed for Nevatim air base and that this fleet was the fleet that would send Israel's nuclear weapons to the target.

Therefore, Israel and its allies defended themselves against 65 ballistic missiles yesterday. And they could only hit 50-55 of them. 10 missiles hit air bases. 7 of these were in Nevatim.

If Iran really wanted to wipe this air base off the map, 3-4 times the 65 missiles it sent yesterday would be enough. Then, the nuclear weapon-loaded F-35s, one of Israel's nuclear trinity, would be destroyed. This is no success, folks. Please don't make fun of our minds.

Click to expand...

I think you're overrating Iran's ability some. I suspect that Israel / the United States would be willing to deploy even more assets in the face of a significant ballistic missile attack. For example, the U.S. did not even use any if it's AEGIS guided missile cruisers or Arleigh Burke Class destoyers. Both platforms carry a plethora of RIM missiles made for intercepting ballistic missiles. Parking a couple of those off the coast (which I suspect you'll see) would greatly strength Israel's air defense.

Furthermore, USA has multiple deployable units that use Patriot air defense systems and PAC 3 interceptors specifically. I wouldn't at all be surprised to see a couple batteries deployed to Israel to further strengthen their ballistic missile defense, after seeing how effective they've been against saturation attacks in Ukraine.

Relic said:

I think you're overrating Iran's ability some. I suspect that Israel / the United States would be willing to deploy even more assets in the face of a significant ballistic missile attack. For example, the U.S. did not even use any if it's AEGIS guided missile cruisers or Arleigh Burke Class destoyers. Both platforms carry a plethora of RIM missiles made for intercepting ballistic missiles. Parking a couple of those off the coast (which I suspect you'll see) would greatly strength Israel's air defense.

Click to expand...

*USN ships shot down 3 Iranian BMs in this attack.

*Only SM-3 and SM-6 from standard missiles family is able to shoot down BMs.

People are forgetting in an all out war, Hezbollah (while taking serious casualties) would still launch tens of thousands rockets which would overwhelm the Israeli AD in the region.

And you can't stop someone from launching rockets by air interdiction only.

Bogeyman said:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779605724894580745

The Israeli cabinet decided to attack Iran tonight.

Click to expand...

Of course.
For all the talk that they intercept 99% of missiles and few damages yet they feel huge humialiation that Iran has manage to attack deep inside Israel.
No country in this world has ever attack inside Israel.
This is a huge symbolism for their people and supporters.

Bogeyman said:

It has been confirmed that a C-130 transport plane and storage areas were hit in Nevatim. So I'll have to round it up.

It was written on Wikipedia that F-35 warplanes were deployed for Nevatim air base and that this fleet was the fleet that would send Israel's nuclear weapons to the target.

Therefore, Israel and its allies defended themselves against 65 ballistic missiles yesterday. And they could only hit 50-55 of them. 10 missiles hit air bases. 7 of these were in Nevatim.

If Iran really wanted to wipe this air base off the map, 3-4 times the 65 missiles it sent yesterday would be enough. Then, the nuclear weapon-loaded F-35s, one of Israel's nuclear trinity, would be destroyed. This is no success, folks. Please don't make fun of our minds.

Click to expand...

Some Iranian telegram channels are claiming that several f35s were damaged at Nevatim but the israelis are heavily censoring any media reports about the effects of the missiles that hit. And to think this was only a drill for Iran you can only imagine what a full saturation attack could do to Israel. If only any arab countries would help they could get rid of Israel in a short time.

Bmx98 said:

Some Iranian telegram channels are claiming that several f35s were damaged at Nevatim but the israelis are heavily censoring any media reports about the effects of the missiles that hit. And to think this was only a drill for Iran you can only imagine what a full saturation attack could do to Israel. If only any arab countries would help they could get rid of Israel in a short time.

Click to expand...

you do understand Israel has nukes right?

As big as Iran's missile arsenal is, I think the real threat comes from Hezbollah. Iran has a huge amount of missiles and drones, but only a portion of these can reach Israel. This is why they invest so heavily in their proxies.

Israel will probably strike Hezbollah in Lebanon first, move onto Iranian backed forces in Syria, before finally focusing on Iran.

It's an uphill battle. Israel needs to keep its airforce intact. They will need clever ways to protect their F35s while they're parked.

The best news is that this so called untouchable country is now touchable...

Afif said:

*USN ships shot down 3 Iranian BMs in this attack.

*Only SM-3 and SM-6 from standard missiles family is able to shoot down BMs.

People are forgetting in an all out war, Hezbollah (while taking serious casualties) would still launch tens of thousands rockets which would overwhelm the Israeli AD in the region.

And you can't stop someone from launching rockets by air interdiction only.

Click to expand...

Both RIM-156 and RIM-174 (SM-6) are able to shoot down BMs. Both AEGIS cruisers and Arleigh Burke Destoyers are capable.

There is no question that Iranian proxies would overwhelm Israeli missile defense systems, but as you alluded to, the cost would be insane. I suspect that Lebanese cities would be bombed into something resembling Gaza City, with the death toll among both the populous and Hezbollah, through the roof.

Relic said:

Both RIM-156 and RIM-174 (SM-6) are able to shoot down BMs. Both AEGIS cruisers and Arleigh Burke Destoyers are capable.

Click to expand...

SM-2 block IV and SM-6 are both somewhat terminal phase interceptors. Only SM-3 has mid course ABM which would have more practical utility in such defensive scenario.

Relic said:

There is no question that Iranian proxies would overwhelm Israeli missile defense systems, but as you alluded to, the cost would be insane. I suspect that Lebanese cities would be bombed into something resembling Gaza City, with the death toll among both the populous and Hezbollah, through the roof.

Click to expand...

Gaza is land locked and Hezbollah is not intertwined with civilians population as densly as Hamas. Besides, Lebanon is large, thus, Hezbollah has room for maneuver and retreat. However, in th end a full scale conventional war would be devastating for Lebanon. But I imagine Iran would not hesitate to sacrifice Hezbollah and Lebanon in such scenario.

wolveray1 said:

By supplying aids and weapons.
What about the rest of the world.
Do they supply any weapons to the palestinian

Click to expand...

And they do it for free? IRGC generals are not getting rich through Palestine together with Hamas high ups? They don't supply any weapon for free, they make money through every bit in Palestine. Don't be too naive.

Anmdt said:

And they do it for free? IRGC generals are not getting rich through Palestine together with Hamas high ups? They don't supply any weapon for free, they make money through every bit in Palestine. Don't be too naive.

Click to expand...

Well at least they still willing to take risk supplying weapons.

What about other countries or organization...are there any of them willing to supply weapons to palestinian.
Most of them are too scared of US,western nations or Israel...or simply just talk too much or crying yet no balls

wolveray1 said:

Well at least they still willing to take risk supplying weapons.

What about other countries or organization...are there any of them willing to supply weapons to palestinian.
Most of them are too scared of US,western nations or Israel...or simply just talk too much or crying yet no balls

Click to expand...

And they are supplying weapons merely because it pays back to them in someway through proxies, i don't see them helping any other opressed muslim community in the world.
This doesn't make them angel or whatsoever, they are the devil they have used to be and who has been stirring middle east as US-Israel have been wanting, for decades. No other country could get what Iran takes back. It is using Palestinian people, it is what it is.

Costin1984 said:

I

Nothing was hit,Iranian propaganda showed some fires in Chile as being their 70s rocket tech hitting something.....The iranians know that they're outmatched so they'll light a useless firework every time the Israelis and Americans butcher their higher ops....and,rinse and repeat

Click to expand...

Bogeyman said:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779648513573269692

Click to expand...

Why are you so sure of what you say when even your dear Israeli friends say the opposite?
Were you there when the missiles hit the base?

Relic said:

I think you're overrating Iran's ability some. I suspect that Israel / the United States would be willing to deploy even more assets in the face of a significant ballistic missile attack. For example, the U.S. did not even use any if it's AEGIS guided missile cruisers or Arleigh Burke Class destoyers.

Click to expand...

"The U.S. moves included repositioning two destroyers, one of which was already in the region and another that was redirected there, U.S. officials said, adding that at least one of the vessels carried the Aegis missile-defense system."

Well, these ships you mentioned were already deployed off the coast of Israel for missile defense. Therefore, it cannot be an excuse to say that the US could have increased the number of missiles hit by using these ships if it wanted to, after the failed attacks.

There seems some Iranian missile tech are so advanced , They can change course , spread decoyes etc etc
While old BM Iran can still use to make israel run out from US arrow 3 ABM
<a href=" ">April 15, 2024</a></blockquote>

BalkanTurk90 said:

There seems some Iranian missile tech are so advanced , They can change course , spread decoyes etc etc
While old BM Iran can still use to make israel run out from US arrow 3 ABM
<a href="

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779693432564310315

">April 15, 2024</a></blockquote>

Click to expand...

Could this video be a shot of that missile from different angles?