It's a loitering munition Baykar calls a "mini cruise missile" for pr, it is no different than others of its kind. But it still isn't an a2a munition so it wouldn't make sense.Kemankes is a mini Cruise missile.
It's a loitering munition Baykar calls a "mini cruise missile" for pr, it is no different than others of its kind. But it still isn't an a2a munition so it wouldn't make sense.Kemankes is a mini Cruise missile.
It's a loitering munition Baykar calls a "mini cruise missile" for pr, it is no different than others of its kind. But it still isn't an a2a munition so it wouldn't make sense.
Andruil's Anvil is also a cruise missile and It is a reusable SAM with vertical take off and landing. Unit cost of Kemankeş is likely a fraction SOM or Anvil. Probably less than 200k$. And Compare that to our SAM missiles, it is going to be a lot cheaper. Hisar missiles aren't cheap. And According to Iranian manufacturer leaked documents, Shaheds cost around 290k$. So Kemankeş can be cost effective solution to these kind of drones.Kemankes is a mini Cruise missile. İt would be too expensive to use it as a drone Hunter.
something like cat pawI would go with improving Mete for air target so a small drone can carry 2 of them, a tb2 can carry maybe 8 of them add a small radar as Poland already did, then it would be a cheap alternative. There was news about integrating Sungur on TB2 but don't know what happened.
Repkon has already shown a drone that can carry 4 Mete (or was it just a rocket that had the same diameter?), and I think some other company had shown one that could carry 2? I really like the idea of sending grenades towards the enemy from a 1+ km away with pinpoint accuracy without risking our soldiers, nor even the drone itself.something like cat pawwe can call it minnak
Btw if a drone can carry at least 4 minnaks, it will create a serious force multiplier in the battle field.
This was confirmed to be incorrect⚓️ Bayraktar TB3 gains submarine hunter capability. Retired Rear Admiral Cihat Yaycı announced that the TB3, developed by Baykar and earning TCG ANADOLU the title of the world's first UCAV ship, has deployed 'Sonobuoy' sensors used for submarine detection into the blue waters.
Source pleaseThis was confirmed to be incorrect
It's not Yaycı's place to announce a Baykar capability. And it is very possibly wrong as well.⚓️ Bayraktar TB3 gains submarine hunter capability. Retired Rear Admiral Cihat Yaycı announced that the TB3, developed by Baykar and earning TCG ANADOLU the title of the world's first UCAV ship, has deployed 'Sonobuoy' sensors used for submarine detection into the blue waters.
I don't see this as a Baykar capability, more like a Navy capability. And is the Navy not known as being more strict with giving information about navy related tests?It's not Yaycı's place to announce a Baykar capability. And it is very possibly wrong as well.
I don't see this as a Baykar capability, more like a Navy capability. And is the Navy not known as being more strict with giving information about navy related tests?
Why would Mr. Yayci want to make himself less credible with such a statement?
The list of credible sources getting shorter and shorter.
It will be, once it becomes a thing. Such a test would be a Baykar/Aselsan test, not a navy test.I don't see this as a Baykar capability, more like a Navy capability. And is the Navy not known as being more strict with giving information about navy related tests?
Sonobuoys themselves are pretty light though, right? At least the ones I checked out were and would they require a cumbersome launcher? Or, would they be just dropped from TB3 and drop with a parachute?Still waiting on that sonobuoy launcher for Aksungur, TB3 I think is too small as a platform for it.
Well, Baykar statesIt will be, once it becomes a thing. Such a test would be a Baykar/Aselsan test, not a navy test.
Still waiting on that sonobuoy launcher for Aksungur, TB3 I think is too small as a platform for it.
I think it will get a smaller launcher compared to Aksungur's one. Considering that one Aselbuoy weighs only 10 kg.Payload - ISR: Interchangeable EO/IR/LD, Multi-Mode AESA Radar, ELINT, Sonobuoy
Expendable sonobuoys in question are very light, 10 kilos for Aselbuoy. The housing/launcher unit and say 6-8 buoys will still come at at least 150 kilos. Anything less than that number, it's not worth it. A drone can stay airborne for more than 15+ hours. It can work as the picket line with 15-16, but won't do well in hunter/killer role.Sonobuoys themselves are pretty light though, right? At least the ones I checked out were and would they require a cumbersome launcher? Or, would they be just dropped from TB3 and drop with a parachute?