Latest Thread
Then even dropped their used external tanks over Turkey on the way back, it was a political crisis at the time.I dont know where to post it but i think belongs to geopolitics ,
I was just watching youtube documentary about israeli operarion orchard bombing Syrian Nuclear site in 2007 and what shocked me is that they said they used Tuekish airspace . I want more info if its true and we let them rape our airspace by small terror state like israel ??
This is photo that deacribe thwir route to bomb nuclear site passing throw Hatay and Turkish border .
View attachment 74728
We should shoot them down how we did with russian aircraft . why not with israeli ? what block Turkiye to act ? i am talking aslo more seriuos israeli acts like when thwir soldiers killed civil Turks in ships in international waters . Normal that act will be answered by bombing a israeli warship or even a military base inside israeli but Turkiye did NOTHING .Then even dropped their used external tanks over Turkey on the way back, it was a political crisis at the time.
"Immediately following the attack, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert called Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, explained the situation, and asked him to relay a message to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad that Israel would not tolerate another nuclear plant, but that no further action was planned. Olmert said that Israel did not want to play up the incident and was still interested in peace with Syria, adding that if Assad chose not to draw attention to the incident, he would do likewise.
On 28 October, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told the Israeli cabinet that he had apologized to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan if Israel violated Turkish airspace. In a statement released to the press after the meeting he said: "In my conversation with the Turkish prime minister, I told him that if Israeli planes indeed penetrated Turkish airspace, then there was no intention thereby, either in advance or in any case, to—in any way—violate or undermine Turkish sovereignty, which we respect".
On 10 October 2007, The New York Times reported that the Israelis had shared the Syrian strike dossier with Turkey. In turn, the Turks traveled to Damascus and confronted the Syrians with the dossier, alleging a nuclear program. Syria denied this with vigor, saying that the target was a storage depot for strategic missiles."
We should shoot them down how we did with russian aircraft . why not with israeli ? what block Turkiye to act ? i am talking aslo more seriuos israeli acts like when thwir soldiers killed civil Turks in ships in international waters . Normal that act will be answered by bombing a israeli warship or even a military base inside israeli but Turkiye did NOTHING .
And thats happens when they have nukes and u dont .
They kills everybody everywhere with Mossad and u elect ocalan family member in parlamentary and other separatist dogs .
Turkiye have all means to stop and punish hard israeli and they cant do nothing . We even shoot down greek aircraft which suppose in paper at least to be allies under NATO and support each other .![]()
It’s not because of the nukes. Russia has many more nukes than Israel, and you shot down their jet.And thats happens when they have nukes and u dont .
Hello.I imagine it's because the Turkish government didn't want to run afoul with the U.S government especially in 2007 when the Bush government was much more inclined to military action in the Middle East. It's was preferable for Turkey to be more restrained to avoid open confrontation especially considering how wide the tech gap was in 2007 which isn't the case now.
Hello.
"It's been 3 weeks since a fatwa from "Muslim scholars" calling all Muslims to jihad was published on a website in Ireland (!)!
I first came across this "holy call" on an Armenian (!) website. I assume that the Greeks and other "friends" of Muslims were also actively spreading this "holy call addressed to all Muslims of the world".
But then a priest from Egypt came forward and announced a cancellation. So he called off the war.
Who are these scholars? Do they have the right to issue a fatwa?
Since when does an Egyptian scholar have the right to cancel it?»
P.S. This post was written before you came to the forum. I have difficulty with English, let alone Egyptian
So let me forward it to you without changes.
It was therefore PM Bülent Ecevit who felt closer to India than Pakistan and believed that Turkey’s military, economic, and political ties as constructed did not benefit Turkey. This supports the argument that individual leaders often play a decisive role in changing the course of a state’s foreign policy choices (Alden & Aran, 2017). As will be discussed later, this will not be the last time that PM Ecevit would try to change Turkey’s South Asia policy.
Under PM Ecevit, Turkey did not approach India out of economic or diplomatic motivations. Rather, Ecevit government seemed to have been inspired by India’s non-aligned position in world affairs. FM Gündüz Ökçün visited India in July 1978, seeking guest status for Turkey in the non-aligned movement (NAM). In a speech he made in India, Ökçün reportedly said Turkey ‘closely observes India’s role and the way in which the policy of non-alignment is implemented for the progress of all humanity.’ Ökçün said his government wanted to develop relations with India in line with its desire to create a zone of peace around Turkey (Access to Archival Databases, 1978).