How much of your national wealth or income is spent on health and education is the valid criteria as per
@Sanchez ’s post.
Really? So US healthcare is better than ours? I don't think so. Turkish healthcare is in the top 5 of NATO with no doubt. And I won't argue if a countries healthcare is good or not if even their own people are afraid of calling an ambulance. Spending 16,5% of tens of trillions dollars doesn't make it good. I wonder in which NATO countries people are not afraid of the bill they will face for having chemotherapy.
There are a lot of criterias to be considered. For example, in Turkiye, average doctor salaries are half of the amount in these countries. And while a doctor in the UK sees 5-10 patients a day, our doctors see no less than 50. So they do 10 times the job they do and get half they get. Side note: we're expected to catch oecd average of doctors per 1000 in the next decade. It was 1,9 in 2018 and 2,3 now. (Oecd avg 3,7)
So, half the amount of doctors per 1000, half the salary= 1/4 of the cost of doctors to healthcare system. Same viable for nurses, dentists etc.
Lower costs of medical schools, lower costs of infrastructure, lower costs of building hospitals, producing meds at lower costs, everything is lower in terms of costs.
So it's not we're not paying enough attention to healthcare. We're doing better than most NATO countries do with that fancy amounts.
I have no commentation on education. Just healthcare.
How do we even plan to increase military spending to 5%?
1,5% of the 5% is allowed to be used in infrastructure and defence industry. So probably our military bases are going to be renewed till there's nothing left old and defence industry funds are going to be higher (good to build infrastructure to produce enough for Europe's future needs). There's 3,5% left which is not scary as 5% when you consider we already spend 2,1% (I know what 1,4% of gdp is. I mean it's not 2,9%.).