Search results

  1. C

    TR Turkish Air Forces|News & Discussion

    You will still rely on spare parts from Germany...Germany is unreliable partner
  2. C

    TR Navy Navy|News & Discussions

    They are patrol boats not FAC...leave them alone Not every ship has to be heavily armed.
  3. C

    TR Air Defence Programs

    Not even spare...we just have launcher for last two Ada's.But not missiles
  4. C

    TR Navy Naval Programs

    Yeah cost much more...Why should we throw away the ready and good system we have?
  5. C

    TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

    We need PIF-PAF or KV for that....But it will be expensive for Block 2's missions
  6. C

    TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

    Not even dual packed...Siper B2 too big, much bigger than SM-2...most likely more than 1 tones i think we will see much more than 150km, when tests end..
  7. C

    TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

    Missile lengths same that just with or without booster length Only retired Block II TLAM-N version have 2400km range because its have small nuclear warhead..There is more space for fuel All of the others 450kg conventional warhead versions's range 1600km or less
  8. C

    TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

    You just not read what your wrote Block II TLAM-N....Means nuclear warhead version and those retired 10 years ago 5.56 length of missile...and 6.25 with booster
  9. C

    TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

    Tomahawk's range 1600km, not 2400km...Thats for small nuke warhead version Scalp Naval (MdCN) also have turbojet engine...its range 1000km but warhead small 250kg Turbofan>Turbojet....You have to compromise on range or/and warhead
  10. C

    TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

  11. C

    TR Air Defence Programs

    i think siper block 2 most likely will use tactical...But with booster(like SM-6/SM-3) will use strike
  12. C

    TR Navy Naval Programs

    i would rather ramjet/scramjet missiles
  13. C

    TR Navy Naval Programs

    i think this better
  14. C

    TR Navy Naval Programs

    But looks like UMR's T/R module numbers way higher than earlier...
  15. C

    TR Navy Naval Programs

    https://www.dzkk.tsk.tr/en-US/Arge/Content/frigate-and-destroyer-projects
  16. C

    TR Turkish Air Forces|News & Discussion

    why would they do? already approved with this ''equivalent''....they can even sold us Aim-120d
  17. C

    TR Turkish Air Forces|News & Discussion

    " nine hundred fifty-two (952) Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM) AIM-120C-8 or equivalent missiles " Only equivalent aim-120D...maybe just maybe
  18. C

    TR Air Defence Programs

    NATO strategy is not suit for us...Our threat perception and strategy different. We are need more and longer range air defence system especially against air breathing targets. Your suggested missile would very very expensive for air defence. We can do both missile but they would be different...
  19. C

    TR Air Defence Programs

    S-400 does not have exoatmospheric interception capability. I think it would be primarily air defence system for againt air breathing targets...Not missile defence system.. İsmail Demir's talk about ''domestic S-400'' is answer for TRT reporter's question ''S-400 ayarında bir savunma sistemini...
  20. C

    TR Air Defence Programs

    Current MK41s in our ships(Gabya, Meko) have 6.7 meter length... MDAS 8 meter length..

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom