Search results

Because people think that TAI will design a new aircraft for serial production just to meet their aesthetics. Changes will definitely happen, there and here. But don't expect a major airframe redesign. Function over form. (+I don't get why it seems ugly to people)

Comparing companies are not exactly a good way, in that way Sukhoi and MiG should also be better than TAI, but i would bet on them being not. Or AVIC, it is kind of recent compared to US or Russian ones, but they are one of the best. There is no reason to blindly say that something made by TAI...

I don't get it, it is not even that high compared to F-22 lol

F-35 is the first, TF-X will be the second one.

All of the things you have said are BS and I am not going to waste time with that. With that having a gun is also unnecessary. Also no, seems like you are the guy who did CFD analysis on TF-X? Cockpit is not even *THAT* high compared to F-22, like dafuq? Why don't you email these to TAI then...

Also guys, vertical stab. is over the engines because of vortex generated by the aircraft. Engines are more seperated from eachother compared to F-22, so the v.stabs end up over the engine. I dont see the problem with this, also I dont see a problem with the canopy too, it is just elevated a...

Are you ok? Lol

Indeed, but sadly i don't have information about the status of RF systems (for TF-X), IR ones tho seems to be promising

Indeed

Uh, according to my sources it is not temporary or non-functional. You can see that gear position is different compared to other aircraft. TF-X gear placement is more similar to F-15s. Panels fold back again

No, it does have retractable gear

Just some maintenance flights or modifications and progress?

LPI

Also, do we have cooled LWIR sensors with good pixel quality and pitch? As we would need it for the IRST

At least ASELSAN kind of finished the work for 10micrometer ones, i guess they would be working on 7.5 after sorting 10micrometer into serial production, maybe near end of this year. Also i have heard that ASELSAN had completed first EO systems for TF-X, my best bet is the ones from NAR MCT...

This means that TF-X empty airframe is lighter than F-22s, considering that TF-X is bigger than F-22, this is really impressive. Congrats to TAI

7.5mm thick panel part is probably for X band, as it is the most optimal thickness for it

They are guesses, also for 0.3 seems like they guessed as 0.1 (which makes more sense) but used 0.3 to "guarantee"

No AESA?

i mean it didn't seem ugly to me