Search results

  1. Radko

    TR Propulsion Systems

    I think we can
  2. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    it is definitely not a drag chute hub, as it is made from different pieces and has serrations both in the connection to the airframe and the nose
  3. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    And what I am trying to tell is that they cannot do it for Kızılelma, stealth is something else, RCS is a dependant stat, it needs good production quality or else it could create fluctuations or spikes in certain areas, which would mean it could hamper operational usage, it seems like they aim...
  4. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    After some usage you can also see defects on F-35 or F-22, indeed Baykar does the job for a lesser quality compared to TAI or LM, but compromising stealth for price is not something good
  5. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    They would still need to run RCS simulations for the overall design. We can easily see that they will replace parts in the future, mainly GNSS thing and antennas, production quality, and actuators. Overall design will stay the same
  6. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    You are not going to design an aircraft without RCS Sims, even 80s aircraft had been tested with those simulations, albeit simpler You really underestimate Baykar tbh
  7. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    This doesn't seem viable Even the TB-2 has really good production quality, Baykar SHOULD NOT comprise it's stealth
  8. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    Not true, ALL OF the TF-X skin is composite
  9. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    I have seen the same layout in a render too, so it might be the real shape
  10. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    Seems like it is supposed to carry 2x BVR and 2x WVR judging by the interesting shape of the bay.
  11. Radko

    TR Aircraft Carrier & Amphibious Ship Programs

    You don't need launching part, but for landing an arrestor gear is planned.
  12. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    According to my calculations Kızılelma-A (with AI-25TLT) used only 350-400 meters of the runway. Keep in mind that Kızılelma-B will use AI-322f that can produce up to 9600lbf
  13. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    Nope, that's the TB-2 that was recording all of the flight
  14. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    Lol what happened with my font 😅
  15. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    The image is just, image The real design is different as you know. Und why ist my font in this way??
  16. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    So yes, TİSU will be a flying wing, tailless, stealth, high payload capacity. Rumours I have heard are that it can carry a payload similar to an Aksungur's MTOW. Maybe I understood it not so correctly but that's what I have heard
  17. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Well yes, but they won't be much of a difference, and actually TF-X might have lighter vertical stabilisators as they are smaller, wing and horizontal stabs are nearly the same size

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom