Search results

Why we don't use DSI for TF-X simple, you can't reach 1.6+ Mach with DSI, you would need unworldly amounts of power for that. So no DSI Also in the photo TF-X looks small but when you actually look, radome is around 4-5 people wide Also for the 5th gen debate, it is about Turkish...

Gökhan and Akbaba is ramjet propelled

we are also trying to find it

sew Size seems a bit deceiving, because we can't really see the back of the aircraft, but she is lit🔥🔥🔥

Oh sorry, and why the caps?

Just one thing, F-35 doesn't have a supercomputer, nor any of the aircraft flying today except some research aircraft probably

I am hoping for Nazar tests, and I wonder aerial DIRCM projects

We still don't know anything about any of those, but just to give some context, BÜRFİS will have more T/R modules than AN/APG-81, it will use GaN and probably more power Frontal RCS of F-35 will be better compared to first blocks of TF-X and probably similar for 2nd block. For having twice...

What happened to the mockup?

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2022235239&_cid=P20-LC2E28-93390-1 Looking at this patent by TAI it looks like this system actually functions as both passive and active RAS/RAM, materials present and how they are situated etc. makes the structure cause destructive...

I mean don't trust on me too, maybe I forgot the details, BUT this looks really similar, also the landing gear and TEBER-82

Everything you have said is wrong. 1-Stealth is not sacrificed fro manoeuvrability 2-Engine outlet not buried≠not stealth 3-WTF is wrong with intake? There is a S duct inside, the intake is absolutely not a problem Surface not being smooth is probably related into rendering

Another thing to add is munitions loaded into pylons look like Teber-82, you might say L-JDAM but their front fins are not that big

GUYS PLEASE CALM DOWN. THERE IS NOTHING RIDICULOUS ABOUT THE PICTURE!! I don't get why you are so keen on them showing pylons? Didn't we also see them in KE illustrations? They are OPTIONAL, I mean can't you see that big a*s internal weapons bay? This thing really looks similar to what I saw...

it is optional, as you can see it also has a big internal bay

There are lot more Pantsirs destroyed by TB-2

Şimşek?

I mean they are not even Su-57s, they are T-50s...

Oh boy here we go again..!

Why are we trying to replace F-16s tho? Just replace most of its job, literally using it just as a BVR platform would be relieving for our F-16s.