Search results

  1. Radko

    TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

    Don't know, I think that they will make it happen before that. Malaysia needs it before 2026
  2. Radko

    TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

    No problem. It is very usual for us to not find the videos/sources easily as there are so much information. Thanks @Yasar
  3. Radko

    TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

    Look at 52:40/46
  4. Radko

    TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

    Hmm, i get it. They changed it when they added a 3d model. In the TF-X it still says cooperation with Turkish F-35As or smt like that.
  5. Radko

    TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

    I don't have the links ready, with some search I can find them. Also, they literally don't update anything, same with TF-X, the website is the same with how it was in 2018, a lot have been changed since then and no update
  6. Radko

    TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

    Temel Kotil said that in an interview
  7. Radko

    TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

    The info in both of those are absolutely outdated. The payload has been increased to 5 tons, wing area is increased, don't know about the ferry range problem
  8. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    But I am still waiting Kızılelma/TB-3
  9. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    That's like 1500kgs of payload, holly fuck
  10. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    Makes sense, maybe TB-3+Kızılelma. Oh I fucking want that
  11. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    internal EW, does the TB-2 have enough energy for that?
  12. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    I agree with this too
  13. Radko

    TR Defence Exports & Updates

    Well, Fırtına 2 has a fully automatic loading system instead of the semi-automatic used in Fırtına. Maybe they have found out that manual tray loading the 155mm is not easy :D
  14. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Yes, that was announced in the roadmap
  15. Radko

    TR Defence Exports & Updates

    Yes, not really worth it as TSK doesn't really have a need for more quicker platform compared to T-155 Fırtına, that's why we have Fırtına 2 instead of Yavuz NG. Probably Panther 155mm does the job enough for the transportable version.
  16. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    I agree, S-300 missiles should have exploded very far away from the TB-2 to not damage it enough, EW pod makes sense
  17. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Yes, I will. Him having good info doesn't mean that I can't criticize "shit" him. Just look at his answer and you will understand.
  18. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    This is kind of whining but this is like 4-5th of Mr.Mevlutoglu's BS answers. I don't get how tf having serrated edges for the access hatches, canopy etc DOES NOT benefit frontal stealth but the "overall" So from this, my best advice for now is, don't take his words for stealth technology...
  19. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Hmm, that 5->5.5 transition looks similar to TF-X Bl1->Twin seat
  20. Radko

    TR Defence Exports & Updates

    . imho, CAESAR 8x8 is a better one because of the autoloader, while the other CAESARs are similar with Yavuz

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom