Search results

It's nice that you are a fan of Indian entertainment. But this isn't the section for posting such stuff. In civilized democracies there entertainment and facts generally come under different silos. Perhaps @Nilgiri can open a sticky for you - "Chinese fans of Bollywood" and you can post your...

BBC article - https://www.bbc.com/news/business-56121470 Huawei is turning to technology for pig farmers as it deals with tough sanctions on its smartphones. The Chinese telecoms giant was stopped from accessing vital components after the Trump administration labelled it a threat to US...

From your own links - Link 1 — While India has recognised him as an Indian national and a formal Navy officer but Indians that Yadev had no link with the Government since his premature retirement from the Navy. Pakistan believes that he is an in-service commander-ranked officer in the Indian...

There you go. #13 refers to 1967. #9 refers to 1962

And here is a neutral source for 1967 — https://books.google.co.in/books?id=RrKYBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA37&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false Says India defeated in 1962 against China. Says China defeated against India in 1967.

Do you have any neutral sources which explicitly state that Jadhav was/is a terrorist. Pakistan claims he was given a trial - just let me know the name of his lawyer in the military trial which allegedly took place.

Cricket in Chinese = Chinese in India.

Bronze automatic diving watch with another Seiko movement. It's a limited edition from a Microbrand. Each bronze watch patinas differently as it comes in contact with air. Thus no two watches are ever the same. This one has an American horween leather strap.

Of course it's not a walkover. Point is any inference espoused should be rooted in fact.

Factually incorrect. In 65 India captured Kargil for good. In 71 they captured the town of Chachro well inside Sindh (which they kept till after Shimla agreement) and captured the Baltistani town of Turtuk. Sawhney is like the anti Arnab - same lies and exaggerations except on the opposite side.

Nice to see you lump Afghanistan and China together as countries from which refugees seek to escape.

Initially they might. But if the Punjabi elite of Pakistan is good at anything - it is pissing off ethnic minorities. Case in point - Mohajirs, Baloch, Sindhis. Don't know about Pashtuns. Bengali outnumbered the Punjabis but even they got fed up.

A significant amount of them do, especially in the Kashmir Valley.

Check the music and the editing Perhaps to cover the 40+ losses and assuage the local population China has released a heavily edited video - @Nilgiri @Zapper

Thing is Pakistan is not an exception here. In fact what happened in Pakistan happened in pretty much all post colonial nations which gained their independence after WW2. Either one party took over, or the military or there was civil war. India is the exception to the rule. And there is only...

So 0?

Maybe that's the narrative in China. The Communist regime is entitled to its views. And yes, how many Indian Kashmiri refugees in China?

Yes, if they or their forefathers specifically fled persecution

In the democratic world they are referred to as 2nd generation refugees. Now how many Indian Kashmiri refugees in China?

I don't think Nazi Germany allowed dual citizenship either - doesn't mean Einstein wasn't a German refugee. Now again, how many Kashmiri Indian refugees in China? Why are you afraid to answer?