Search results

It seems like real studies on the national CMC turbine blade and duplex fuel injector project started on 30 January 2021 as a Ph.D. program. The full text can be read here. https://tei.com.tr/uploads/docs/1606310089_teigtutubitak2244jobpostingnov2020.pdf Those studies can bring us up to the...

When the mistake is obvious I have no choice but to correct it. I explain in-depth how SToT and DToT differ in cruise missiles compared to artillery. How we can't compare Atmaca that follow 3D waypoints to artillery missiles and shells with ballistic trajectories.

https://www.savunmasanayist.com/trmotorun-tum-hisseleri-tusasa-gecti/ TAI/TUSAS acquired all the shares of TRMotor. Now TAI/TUSAS owns both TRMotor and TEI. TAI/TUSAS partnering with TAEC(RR&Kale) means all of the companies can work together without issue.

This is actually really good for us. Established gas turbine technology is changing we can jump the wagon of CMC turbine blades if we act fast similar to UAVs. And it is probably easier to produce CMC blades than single crystal alloys. We have the ability to produce Boron Carbide(B4C), Silicon...

Yes, but when you are coordinating anti-ship missiles things differ. Advanced 3D mission planning software is needed to have a precise SToT capability when you fire anti-ship missiles from a ship and when 2 or more ships are involved ships have to be networked together so that the mission can be...

I never said that. That is your understanding. SToT and DToT capability have nothing to do with that.

This part is wrong. And you wrote a completely different thing in your next post.

https://www.roketsan.com.tr/uploads/docs/kataloglar/ENG/1628389395_atmaca-anti-ship-missile.pdf

This is wrong. Atmaca and Çakır have basic swarm capabilities. Atmaca has the capability of ToT*, DToT**, and SToT***. * Time on target (It means hitting a target at the desired time) ** Designated time on target ( A ship launches 2 or more Atmaca with different routes to hit a target at the...

We don't want Çakır to end up as a million-dollar product. Atmaca and Çakır have many things in common and we are using that architecture to keep costs in check.

AKP is kicking out Ethem Sancak from the party membership :D

We won't be retiring KC-135s soon they will serve at least another decade.

Roketsan runs 70 projects from its own resources. Tubitak SAGE runs 60+ projects. Next year we will probably need the power of mighty @Oryx to keep track of unveiled Turkish defense industry projects.

Russian UAV systems are problematic. They are at least a full decade behind us.

Turkmenistan TB2s use Hensoldt Argos II Kyrgyzstan TB2s use Aselsan CATS

Turkish Trainer Jet(Hurjet) offer to Malaysia %50-50 partnership Commodities can be accepted as a payment Malaysian-produced avionics can be integrated( not the whole package as much as Malaysia can contribute) 3 aircraft will be delivered in Turkiye, 15 aircraft will be delivered in Malaysia...

Çakır is not an anti-ship missile. It is a multi-purpose light cruise missile. Çakır started as an anti-ship missile but evolved into a multi-purpose missile., It will replace Maverick as well as Penguin.

Depends where you hit. A lucky hit to the fuel depot or armory can make all the difference.

Tanks are still important but the days of the 60+ ton behemoth tanks are over. Tanks will evolve. Lighter tanks(~50 tons) with less crew, even lighter optionally manned tanks, and even lighter robotic/unmanned tanks will appear. Advanced nations can build lighter tanks without sacrificing armor...

Yeah, it seems like OMGSF and the Multi-Purpose missile project are merged and now ÇAKIR became a multi-purpose missile. ÇAKIR abbreviation must be something like "Çok Amaçlı KIzılötesi Roket" (Multi Purpose Infrared Rocket) ÇAKIR will probably be fired from sea, air, and possibly land against...