Search results

Well yes but if you build 250 of them you still have to maintain them and hit certain flight hours for every pilot annually. About 200 is good and I think we were down do 150 hours few years back.

Think like this, fuel cost of 250 KAAN alone is 2 times that of 250 F16

Those calculations are too old and both KAAN and F35 would end up being way more expensive and difficult to operate than imagined.

Sounds like a job for drones. Why go backwards?

Did you find 600 billion dollars on the ground for next 30 years

That should include F16 Özgür

Article says 32 VLS as well. Interesting but meaningful choice considering lack of A2A fighter. Probably also makes it easier to manage lower number of AD Destroyers.

Interesting detail about Frigate based air defence system and launcher placement. Looks like Ada class?

All I hope quadpack is available in next 5 years and say not 10, so like after the batch of 6-7-8 but hopefully before 9-12 are built.

The decision to keep 16 VLS might mean they are more confident with Sapan block 2 quadpack. But I think even with that it might be worth considering additional launchers, based on Göksur missiles etc. I don't think 3rd set of Istif makes too much sense without modification

My guess probably just more milden and helicopters for frigates :) (Besides TF2000 immediately )

Man couldn't they have gone 1 by 1 or waited a little for some of the Hisar and İstif to be delivered

929 is long forsaken... More importantly we still have same problem for T925 though

Yes I mean the idea was only first 3 would use foreign engine but it seems first 20 will go same way

I think this means they decided to procude more with the foreign engine then for initial batch

TAI will continue making KAAN :) All it means is funding continues coming and scope is becoming more defined

Apparently Air Force really sees Typhoon as a serious requirement.

Do you consider competence a resource?

That's a weird looking harrier

Juan Carlos I visiting İstanbul