Search results

  1. Radko

    TR Navy Naval Programs

    Afaik it ended up underperforming, maybe they are planning to do a better version or I am not up to date.
  2. Radko

    TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

    Any stats you can share with us?
  3. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    We already had a photo of Akıncı with SOM (not J) in the middle with MAM-T, new we need Çakır
  4. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Can you share some more info?
  5. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    Keep in mind that this not the full payload, yes all stations are full but we have seen Akıncı carrying more before
  6. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    iirc Peregrine was able to deliver same range as AIM-120C with nearly half the size. And yes, for now it can carry 4 BVR and 2 WVR, we need to develop the bay to accommodate squeezed BVR missiles (like F-22)
  7. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Yes but they can't Yes but they can't carry CMs. And should we consider Su-57 as 5th gen?
  8. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    TF-X is the only 5th gen air *dominance*
  9. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Well i do agree with you, even if they, it wouldnt be before 2030s because of the production queue
  10. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    well all the things about LPI, most of the cliams are, claims. The problem with intercepting LPI is modern LPI radars can mix and match their signals with background noise, they are nearly undetectable. So thats why both sides will be using radar and EW. And intercepting radars are usually not...
  11. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Haha, I just said that ASELSAN has experience in IR field before, so they wouldn't bring a bad product. Also, I didn't want to make DAS look easy to do neither
  12. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Yes :DD
  13. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Su-57 lacks VLO geometry, what about 4.9? :D
  14. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    1- I said they are not an issue for now, they will be a problem when TAI/Havelsan decides to increase AI etc. And keep in mind that 2 of these F110s also keep F-15EX at the sky, yeah TF-X will probably consume more power, but at least for IOC, it should be enough. I didn't said F110 won't have...
  15. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    From Anatolian Eagle 2021/2, it was stated that BEOS will have greatly better quality than ASELPOD, so I don't think that there will be problems with BEOS, So about IRST, I need to check what they offer, but the chances are I can't find anything. But with given experience of ASELSAN in thermal...
  16. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    1- electric generation is not much of a problem, at least for now, and there are also APU's. But yeah in the future an engine with more power gen would be good 2- Noise is not a big problem for now, at least when the F110 TF-X will be around 3-IR signature is not too high, yes it is higher...
  17. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    Because it is bothering to reply all of your BS claims
  18. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    Yeah let's make TAI produce 10 different products at the same time and end up with shitty quality on all of them. Can't you get that TAI would need to expand its resources (+more money from state) while Baykar already has a working prototype with some RCS reduction and good stats? And keep in...
  19. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    1- STM Kargu is not few, neither Lapis drones, Kargı will also be in mass production 2-TB-2 is cheap and effective while Anka is expensive 3- Aksungur had to be integrated with some tech before order from Navy 4- Baykar uses civilian engines while TAI uses military for most of the time, TAI is...

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom