Search results

@Zafer Is right. Yes, TEI designed the PD-170 engines, but had the bodies of PD-170 prototype engines cast by a British casting company. Therefore, TEI cannot be blamed for the newly commissioned PD-170s. Designing is one thing, being able to mass-produce the product you have designed is another...

Simple. It will take off with less load but will stay in the air more longer. Instead of bombardment and attack missions, it will perform observation and intelligence missions.

mius+akinci (for now)

@TheInsider Why? Why easier?

That's true. In this case, it is not Iran that matters for Turkey. Iran will always be hostile. In Syria, outcome will be determined according to Turkey's negotiations with USA. I think that Turkey still has not met on a common ground with USA.

Are there any qualified soldiers left worth pulling? I think Russia has withdrawn its experienced soldiers from Syria until now.

+1 And nonrotating AESA radars is more costly.

I am in. No problem anyway.

Completelly wrong.

But with little bit more diameter. ;) And this issue of diameter is being discussed.

All of them OK, but why Araps and Indians?

"We will build the MMU engine in 10-12 years, but it will be a little bigger in diameter, that's what was discussed." said Prof. Akşit. He also said that the TFX body was designed before the engine, which is a flawed approach. I think that they have turned to RR origin engine because both the...

Hımmm, IMO, Nigerian TB2's and she's crew...

True. But, missiles/glide bombs have been developed for fighter jets that can make precise strikes from a longer range. Stealth technologies and RF decoys were also developed for fighter jets. Drones have also developed that can take over many of the tasks of jets. Finally, because of their...

Yes, you are right. Fortunately Altay not yet born! The Germans may have unwittingly done us a huge favor.

Then it will. In their current MBT form, they are nothing more than armored target boards.

+1 Exactly! For this reason, the classic MBT concept has collapsed. If tanks are to exist on battlefields, they have to undertake a different task than they do now. Of course, they will be equipped according to these new task descriptions. To me, this new task is to command unmanned armored...

I have two question: a) Why were the Neptune anti-ship missiles not used against landing ships in front of Odessa? b) There are other Russian ships in the Black Sea besides Moskva. Why weren't those Neptunes thrown at them until now?! Does Ukraine only have enough missiles to hit Moskva? LOL

German passive armour technology is not unique. Active armour technology? An another discussion topic.

In fact we have a platform that fits full of Ukraine's urgent needs. However, do we give it? I am not sure.