Search results

This is the first mention of India in this thread. This is the lie you stated. In the civilized, democratic world this is called whataboutism https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/whataboutism Now shed your India centric obsession and learn to defend criticism

Doesn't answer my question. Who brought India up first in this thread, when this thread had nothing to do with India. You or I?

Who mentioned India in this thread first? You or I? That would explain the obsession

I have to say I haven't seen anyone so defensive about their country. Why is that. Is it shame? Jealously? Inferiority complex?

That's not how things work on International forums in the democratic, civilized world. If you put up fluff propaganda pieces, you will be called out. If you can't handle the heat, get out of the kitchen.

We will as soon as the 100,000 Chinese refugees return home to China. By the way, why do you keep posting multiple articles and videos about how good China is, if you don't like others criticizing or laughing at your absurd Communist propaganda?

Lol. I am talking about the press freedom index. https://rsf.org/en/ranking China ranks 177/180 China should aspire to catch up with Equatorial Guinea first before it even begins to compare itself to actual democracies.

As I said, to the democratic world they are Chinese refugees. Whether a brutal regime considers those who escaped its clutches to be refugees or not is not even a consideration.

My concern is for all people living under brutal regimes who don't have democracy - China is just one of them, along with North Korea, Mauritania and other countries in that category.

Maybe that's the narrative in Communist regimes. In the democratic world, they are Chinese refugees.

Our obsession with China stems from the 100,000 Chinese refugees who have sought refuge in India. Once China stops its atrocities and the Chinese refugees return back home, our obsession with China will end

Or they didn't they about their existence because of the Communist regime.

Probably because of a deep rooted sense of inferiority complex. "Studies show that consumers are particularly attracted to luxury when they feel less confident and less powerful compared to others, and they anticipate to experience a boost in confidence and power by buying and consuming...

Again, these aren't luxury brands anywhere.

Don't know how the communist regime gauges success but the metrics of success are different in the democratic world

Thanks for your suggestion. Done it. And it's quite obvious. Not every society is evolved enough to adopt democracy. China has a few decades to catch up.

They are all very mid level brands in the rest of the world at best - H&M in fact is dirt cheap. Maybe these brands are considered worth "top dollar" in China. It's not the case in the RoW

Good. Nike, H&M and Adidas should not associate themselves with supporters of a genocidal regime.

That might be something fed to the gullible Chinese masses. The facts are in the open in the democratic, civilized world.

Yes, such a good role model that Tibetans and Uighurs have seen their culture and way of life destroyed.