Search results

We need to make many unlikely things happen to achieve targets but we are known to make the unlikely things. We will just work smarter and harder.

We are aiming $500bn in the short term to medium.

We won't stop making it because it is hard to make. We don't need to keep many fighter planes on the ship. Even 4 planes can give the punch we need for most operations we can hope to make from this ship. And we will most likely have the second one, we can operate them together if need be.

Update: $166bn until 25th of December.

We can do even better. We can fit our existing LHDs to operate light aircraft from. Full size Aircraft Carriers should be made for our full size aircraft the MMU(TFX).

Tejas did this many moons ago, I believe developers of Hürjet have taken notice of this already. There is a good chance Hürjet can be offered to prospective buyers in stead of an F35B going forward.

By introducing a proper aircraft carrier in the medium term. Also there are views that the light attack fighter project Hürjet can be altered to operate from this class of LHD.

TFX specks changed quite a bit over time and it is ever larger and larger. A king size or emperor size plane, likely.

This story is totally different from the known methods of hydrogen fuel technologies and not in the existing Boren studies. Like 400 times the power.

However it is bound to get reduced in size to add structural strenght and it would probably be around 125cm or so if 20% reduced due to crinkling, my speculation.

If the 5 by 7 meter sheet metal is for the casing of the engine, it is huge, like 159cm diameter if it is used without crinkling it.

This story is not about hydrogen fuel cells, it is about hydrogen being used as a fusion material. It is more about nuclear energy than chemical. Basically you shine a laser light beam on some hydrogen atoms and and turn them into helium atoms that is missing an electron. In turn the Helium atom...

This solves the energy problem of cars and everything else. But where is the evidence that it will work?

We don't want to replace them, we want to supplement them. I would always see the positive side and think about what value it adds to our capabilities. If it works very well then we expand its stock if not we keep it limited. Thinking of how capable our small arms industry has become it won't be...

So what. Every piece of equipment has its place. If other calibers are not ideal for certain purposes then you make new ones. We have both expertise and other resources to make them. US have even bigger stock but it doesn't stop them from making new ones. 6.8 is the midway between 5.56 and 7.62...

US Army is looking into 6.8 caliber for the sake of body armor piercing capability at far distance. We should look into it for the sake of verity in our capabilities. It shouldn't be too hard to introduce it with all the experience we have now.

Your observation is far from reality. A few people sampled on the net do not paint the picture. Those worked towards the collapse of the Ottoman Empire are many but the main ones are as you defined them. Some of the remaining ones also exist in the current population of Turkey. Most Turks are...

I was thinking supersonic speeds are not really possible with small engines and airframes but I saw the other day that a British professor and his team are trying to make a supersonic small UAV at around 20kg weight. So it boils down to power/weight ratio of the system. There is some allegations...

If it can be fitted with a Turkish engine the Hürjet can be highly optimized for a certain mission. I wish the trainer function becomes secondary to the fighter function rather than the other way around.

On the contrary Israel has stepped out of its calm policy and is slowly causing alarms to go off as to how Israel is a threat to the region. Israel needs to ease its tension more than Turkey does.