Search results

Deindustrialization? I thought the most industrialization country in Europe was Germany. More than one and half trillion dollars of export. I don't know if any developed country has such high export to GDP ratio in the world.

Anybody can start a war. I am not talking about the ability to start a war. I am simply stating, legally who was the aggressor in 1967.

And now you are are coming with lame excuses. Egypt had the full sovereignty over Suaz canal, recognized by the international community. If you don't know what sovereignty means look it up in the dictionary. You can't claim someone else's sovereignty is your red line, and start a war because...

Let's not make up false history. It was the Israel who attack those countries fast. Just like it did in 1956.

Hasan Mahmood meeting with Ajit Doval in Delhi on Myanmar situation Bangladesh Foreign Minister Hasan Mahmud, who is visiting India, held an emergency meeting with India's National Security Advisor Ajit Doval on Wednesday morning. It is also known that the border situation in Myanmar was...

63 more Myanmar security forces take shelter in Bangladesh Amid the ongoing conflicts along the Bangladesh-Myanmar border, 63 more Myanmar forces and border guards have taken shelter in Bangladesh till Wednesday noon, taking the total number to 327, said BGB sources. A total of 327 Myanmar...

Could you post some specific photos highlighting the thrusters? I don't see any here.

Wow, is M-SAM-ii really a kenetic interceptor like PAC-3? I didn't notice it before.

I love the costume.

Perhaps cold launch like this below, I assume.

Assembly is not that hard. Specially when you already have a proven design. But nobody gives the technology of how to fabricate HD IIR and image sensors. Iirc, Aselflir-300 used to contain foreign sensor until ASELSAN made their own.

That is a very interesting take, After seeing what is going on in Ukraine conflict I was thinking even the existing 10x division is barely enough. But, yes. BD's terrain is not at all favourable to conventional rapid armor thrust.

I think there is a misunderstanding. I am not disputing what you said. Just saying that, in the end no matter what either parties (Pakistan or India) tries with regard to Kashmir, change of border/status quo is very unlikely. All the effort will be fuitile as serious escalation is not possible...

Interesting....I guess Kashmir is a deadlock as both parties are nuclear power. Of course, not now. But if it ever becomes real.(hopefully never) To defend BD?

Well, obviously today India as a state with its institutions does not have any long term strategy or foreign policy goal with expansionist ambitions (except for the dispute over Kashmir or what you call as POK) Hopefully, it will always remain like that. But if this ideology starts to get more...

https://bdnews24.com/bangladesh/5j9il1tdie

Obviously, there is no sense to it. Taking in hundreds of millions of massive hostile populations (in war) from Pakistan & BD without any obvious economic benefit is a very bad idea. But these things usually don't make lot of sense. Specially when it gets that much ideological. There is not...

Of course, I am just saying it as the ultimate weapon.

let’s be honest, y'all want something like this.

as always. It isn’t largely a democrats vs Republicans thing. See how it goes even if Republicans win the next election. They will continue to try influence our foreign policy regardless. As I said, USA want to have say in our stuff. And it will get one.