Search results

I mean, sorry. I didn't want to laugh until you said Türkiye should have had an uncle Vlad.🤣

Are new Barak and VL mica coming? Because previous deals included 2x battery of VL mica and 2x of BARAK-8 MX to my knowledge.

Hacked.

Excellent work, almost like a chapter from a relevant book. I will probably read it few more times to fully grasp depth of the content here.

That is debatable tbh, actual troops number being 91,000.

My bad, i meant 'if it were still burning.' And the point is still valid. What?? No, I don't think that. There is a thing called stand-off range. Ships equipped with long range SAM like ASTER-30, BARAK-8 ER or SIPER II would be very lethal if Fighters get within its NEZ. Yeah, that is...

1. ESSM's motors burns out before it reaches 20km. And even if it were still running, this would've been a good thing given it will allow the missile to take advantage of its TVC and maintain 60g maneuverability until the very last moment. 2. Fighter does not need to come within 100km to...

Exactly.

Bruh, I want a retirement like this when I am old!

Yes. Unless they are flying at high altitude, which they don’t when approaching the target.

I am wondering when will they offer it for export.

Modern AShM cruise at 3-5 meter or lower. They usually appear on radar screen at 20-30km depending on how high your radar's placement is and the altitude AShM is cruising at. But you simply don’t detect them beyond 35km with ship's sensors. (Unless you have ISR assets in the sky above) How ESSM...

https://www.drdo.gov.in/sites/default/files/technology-focus-documrnt/TF_Dec_2019_Web.pdf As @Nilgiri Explained, it was for initial production.

Not nuclear science. Still, HISAR-N would do a quicker 90 degrees turn immediately after the launch compared HISAR-RF with booster (SIPER block i)

Technically SIPER interceptors (block i/ii) can shoot down AShM. However, interceptors that meant for long range and high altitude is not economically feasible for point defence. That is why every country including Turkey has more cost effective medium category of missiles for point defence...

And I don’t understand which part is irrelevant. In your proposed models, it’s only SIPER interceptors in VLS (Whether, single packed or quad packed) and various kind of CIWS, like Hybrid Göker, Gokdeniz ER/Levent. (As I mentioned before, Auto cannons like Gokdeniz as well as short range...

1. 100km long range high altitude SIPER interceptors (single packed or quad packed) in VLS are not suitable for point defnece. 2. Göker hybrid launchers or Gökdeniz ER or Levent all are classified as CIWS.(CIWS is a term that is used for both autocannon and SHORAD on the ship) That is why i...

You are proposing CIWS as ship's only point defense. Which may work for corvettes, but sound unrealistic for frigates, which operates in high intensity environments regardless of its role. CIWS missiles usually have only one shot at a single target in a given scenario. Which defeats the purpose...

This one.

My fav is SAS and 1st SOFD-D. When fighting a full scale conventional war behind enemy or in urbanised terrain, army guys are the best. (Given their experience with combined arms manoeuvre)