Search results

Its our wise thought, but its only twice in history of Marinir use what Army use regarding the armored vichele and it is the BDRM 1 and amx-10P that donated from the army inventory for marinir and they hate it ever since becouse none of them are good enough for their requirement. Do pandur...

Its still need much will and improvement for this hope they continue their development

Kaav / Zaha since bomerang and BMP 3 F / BT 3F / Vena doesnt found any lander also CATSAA

sweetener for KDX sejong class ( without SPY 1 V radar ) they offer to Navy

Mado what about s 70 i any news you can share..? thx

That s why they recuit the navy personel into their rank without it they have zero chance to operate such of weapon regard

They want minimal 76mm like otmel they still lobying on it but having 30mm is far more than only 12.7 mm

Have we paid the overdue kfx bill...?

For now we do have limited resourche it will need more invest for adding the number

S70i

For me U209 NG most realistis choice for PAL they already prepared and now have the jigs & tolls and experince from building changbogo class and better to mastered it first with building a legal U 209 before staping forward to U214 class the korean did it turkis did it to so why we wont...

Hip have more advantage to maountainaous tarrain like papua then the huey or other rotary wing asset of penerbad

- Doule engine to 🤩 Dont know why but i am bit of fans of those super hornet

Some of lvtp 7 from korea are originaly "ambulance" version

Army

True but is that just a usual thing happened right for promotion thing etc. and when you guys vocaling about iver or lafayate and other used frigate boom there they are bag the contrac with less "gaung" than other competitor. Nothing is certain at this point just expect the unexpected with brave...

Not that i just reply to "ga ada Gaung" thing. About freem procurement that also "ga ada Gaung" , but boom there you have it.

Remember fincantieri..?

1. As i recall every joint training conduct in US ,AUS, or Other NATO Allince Homeland are provided by " Tuan Rumah " 2. It's just usual on every Joint Training 3. Its for easy use and familiar for abroad user who is doing the training CMIIW for this Regard

UAV ,Hello'S,fighter,missle,troop transport,etc....seem's good