Search results

Do you have man count?

At the end we see retracting land gear (front & aft)

Does it mean lower weapon load and higher endurance-range?

The only missing one is DIRCM

What the hell is that?

Guys, SOM-C1 will have tactical datalink but her warhead won’t designed to as a truely anti-ship aka semi-penetrating HE, unlike SOM-J. This is not mean that SOM-C1 can’t be used as ASuW weapon but this is the SOM-J’s main aim.

SOM is not designed to hit naval targets, but SOM-J

IR seeker of Standard missile is on the right side just below the cone.

Technically 105 mm is mainly antipersonnel, 203 mm is mainly antistructural and 155 mm is in between and more versatile 90 kg warhead is a magical point within existing warheads. Think unitary MLRS and SDB-1 of Americans “It’s sufficient to destroy a single floor structure without damaging nearby”

Is TS-7500 coming? PS: Engine of CH-53K

Navalization of current design is more logical for me

155 mm ammo weights 45 kg whereas 203 mm is 90 kg. You need a heavier platform

Syria experiences has been shown their effectiveness against buried structures. It’s not easy.

ACV-15 modernization project

Prototype for a product already in production for a long time? I smell Aselsan! ;)

Hard to detect & nearly impossible to distinguish from a civilian speed-craft without visual confirmation

That number includes 5.56’s also

I know that’s around 40k

Price is not a top priority for an aero-engine. Performance and reliability are. Main logic here is to compress thin air of the high altitude which causes power drop in the current form. So, it had not to be in the current known form of a supercharger. P.S. I’m not an engineer.