Search results

Good news! Local industry participation in supplying PGM would reduce cost and foreign dependency. Is this specific to UAE variant of rafale or would be available for 3rd parties too?

@Heartbang You probably meant IIR signature exposure?

Me 7 years old fighting my cousin, except I fell in the road and and a rider with bicycle run over my right shin.😅

Chill out, what’s the issue? They are buying it for utility purpose. Really cheap and reliable.

I remember, ATMACA was tested with KTJ3200. It was posted somewhere here.

Tbh, JASSM and ATACMS could be possible. However, I don't think it is very practical for UK and France to send 100 more scalps. Their stockpile is really limited. The same is true with the production capacity. (Unless they are actively planning long term investment to up the production capacity)

@Ryder our kiliçdaroglu is way better than yours.🤣 At least he is super successful in his Acting profession. Maybe you guys could hire him for the next election.🤣

I forgot his name.🤔

@Anmdt previously Said, even the new interceptor will get booster eventually. Like SM-2 series.

Why they are holding up 20% of three decades old engine tech? GE already running ground test with their 6th gen XA101. Surely, it wouldn’t hurt them give India full access to F414s technology.

Yeah, he wrote something like that in Turkish air force disscusions too. But I disagree, as I said,we don't need it to be complete trench 3 equivalent. In my opinion, Spanish upgrade model would have been good enough for us. However, as you said, BAF already made up its mind for new fighters .

Cut off the last one!

After doing some search it appears, one cannot legally marry an inanimate object in any country (including Türkiye)

This project has been under the pipeline for a long time even though it was only officially announced last year(?) I believe, like the drone project they have been working on it (on a conceptual level) for few years now. Foreign help is definitely involved but I don’t think it is only a mere...

Yeah, sure. My main point was, its data link is currently limited by 50km. (In the future up to 100km) So, even though it has 200km range, outside of its data link range, it will be useful against predetermined known targets only. (like SOM-B1/B2)

I know, I should have differentiate in my post. SOM-B1/B2 is meant for fixed and ground targets only. (So data link is not required) On a side note- Is kement data link planned for SOM-j too? Because, it was still using link 16.

If ESSM or HISAR-D misses its target on first attempt there is no way they can take a 180 degrees turn to chase the target again. (Even with a second pulse motor) Only time a missile can take a 180 degrees turn when its primary motor is running. (Even that is going to greatly reduce its...

To shoot down incoming threats (subsonic/supersonic cruise missiles, loitering ammunitions, drones and helicopters) I believe there could a reliable middle option in between CIWS and quick reaction missiles, using the main gun of the ship. Adding unprecedented operational flexibility to ship's...

Of course, with its ATA it can always engage targets of opportunity. However, when data link is lost you simply don't know what it is hitting nor you have any control over it. (I don't see any point in letting it loose after 50km, unless you launched it to a predermined target.) But with SOM...

Hehe, everybody in Europe now suddenly needs tanks. (I guess, 6 billions would mean around 200 hundred Leo-2 A8)