Lol, we dare them, their top general even directly called Chinese counterpart without telling then US president Trump to ensure China that nothing US military will do to harm China, if this happened in China, this general will lose his job the next day, do you call this professional?
Do these...
That doesn't make him a good commander, Mao had never attended any collleges or military academies, but he beat all who did. Peng dehuai was a farmer, but he still beat US troop away from the Chinese border and made macarthur suffer a humiliating dimissal.
He is not in combat unit, only a civil servant, he leads no troops. I m pretty sure that if China were a democratic country, He would definitely be elected into the highest level of the Chinese government, cause Mao still has lots of followers among the Chinese public. The reason now he is...
He is not in combat unit, only a civil servant, he leads no troops. I m pretty sure that if China were a democratic country, He would definitely be elected into the highest level of the Chinese government, cause Mao still has lots of followers among the Chinese public. The reason now he is...
There are not one wielding any political influence in the Chinese government who are related to any previous leaders, Mao zedong, Deng xiaoping, Jiang zemin, Hu jintao, XI jinping. We don't have Nehru dynasty or Bush dynasty in China.
Yes, he is Mao's only grandson, but he just holds some ceremonial rank, (not a very high ranking, major general ) which has no power at all. He has zero influence in the Chinese politics, how about The Nehru–Gandhi Family in democratic India?
Why China is closer to reality on democracy and human rights than the West
No one is the sole arbiter of these abstract ideals of our common humanity. Beijing’s ‘results-oriented’ and pragmatic approach arguably delivers more benefit to its people
Published: 6:00am, 3 Jul, 2021
The West...
China's meritocracy: Selection and election of officials
China has a unique system of selection and election of officials, which Canadian scholar Daniel A. Bell has described as "political meritocracy."
Unlike Western models, China's selection of officials is focused on ability and merit...
In China, it's true that radical, sensationlised reporting is being curbed and rising nationalism is being subdued by the government, because the govenment knows they are not good for the country, if China makes new policies and plans, they should be based on thorough research, study and...
It was a wrong policy, democratic or not, all governments made wrong policies some times, even they are with good intentions, they are just honest mistakes, a capable govenment has the ability, courage and will to correct mistakes and learn from them, an incapable government doesn't.
In democracy, people tend to pick their like minded candidates, if the majority of the general public believe cow pee cures cancers, they will choose a candidate who also believes so, and the whole nation will be stuck in this stupidity forever. Fools like fools.
They both rose to prominance through forming political parties and entering democratic elections, without this so called democratic election, they wouldn't have any chance to start with. Democray is very dangerous when a whole nation goes mad.
Some Indian users here always ridicule the Chinese government, the Chinese communist party and Xi jingping. let's do a reality check to see who is a better government, better party and better leader serving their country and people better.
India economy: Seven years of Modi in seven charts
By Nikhil Inamdar and Aparna Alluri
BBC News, Delhi
Published22 June 2021
Narendra Modi stormed India's political stage with grand promises - of more jobs, prosperity and less red tape.
His thumping mandate - in 2014 and again in 2019 -...