Search results

AF said it was flying above an FPSO not an oil rig

Indeed, for now, I don't think there's a problem in terms of UNCLOS with the F-18 And this is not the first time a CV (and its aircraft) operates in our EEZ So the only potential problem (if there's any) would only be limited to the safety aspect of the flight and not sovereignty issues...

As the writer on the NST article explained, the 'rights and duties of the coastal State' in Article 58 is limited to "sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the natural resources" (Article 56) In other words, economic rights, not security/military...

CMIIW Bawean Incident and the latest Natuna case are completely different cases. You need to learn about the difference between territorial waters and EEZ

Maybe (which part/article of UNCLOS are you citing?) https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnists/2017/05/241775/unwise-restrict-foreign-vessels-malaysias-eez

Keyword: UNCLOS and Peacetime

don't be too harsh on them wkkwkw If it is located in our ZEE, then:

Well they're flying side by side https://www.instagram.com/p/CNU9MXrlMGB/

2,5 ++ years Is it a new record?

It's not 'warships' per se

Ikr, they still focused on air to air and air to ground roles Can't blame them oc with all budget limitation that we have

Wonder if our AF will significantly increase its air-to-surface capabilities or not by buying dedicated AShM missile