Search results

Agree that we need both systems (mobile land-based and sea-based) I'm just confused with your previous post. It seems like you're saying that TBoat is easier to hide than mobile land-based AShM. They're at least the same when it comes to avoiding enemy detection. IMO, land-based AShM can avoid...

Won't have many options? Malacca, Sunda, and Makassar strait literally located next to our major islands: Java, Sulawesi, Kalimantan, "utilizing their shallow draft, they can sail close to the coast in attempt to make detection more difficult (i.e. using ground clutter as disguise)." And why...

So....KCR?

You'll get the answer by comparing LCU and TBoat dimension

I'll stick with my boatanized wkwkwk The Q is whether the army (or any services that will operate it) will use it as a spearhead/1st wave in a contested environment/beach like what Marine's Yontankfib will do If not, Stanag III is 'ok'

I proposed we called it 'Boatanized Infantry' :D Depends on the protection level that it has. Does anyone know about it? If it was intended to be used for 1st wave, IMO, it should have at least STANAG IV protection

let's pray that at least their jeroan have a high % of commonality

You should first ask whether local industries have the production capacity to quickly fulfilled Polri's needs or not