Search results

If I remember correctly, Mado said LHD is Navy’s stuff but what inside it will be operated by other branch. (Air Force's F35B, some army's helos, etc)

Erieye instead of Globaleye huh? 😩

Well, if it's true. There's no way they gonna let Rafale deal slip away.

Sorry mado I don't see they offer us F35, just the "F16v is the right track to get F35 in the future" all over again. They maybe can kill Boeing offer but not dassault.

"Di masa depan". They have to put them both together at the same time! Duduk Viper e saiki, lightning ee engkok! And how about their weaponry? Long range cruise missile?

Well, the latest update is Kc46 has a lot of problems, USAF refuse to accept them.

Do our TNI will ever get a dedicated military satellite? 🤔😔

That's why I said they don't have to be all asw config. If we got 8 asw mogami, we don't need fremm to be all asw

ASW Fremm have 76mm otomelara instead of 127mm on General purpose config. So you need to sacrifice something.

Sembah baginda 08!! They don't have to be all ASW config

And how about advance training jet? Hundred of new advance fighter but only 14 T50 to train new pilot!

I see a sudden surge of MBT related content about TNI or just my imagination 🤔 ?

Rafale can loosen it more, weapon system isn't just missile.

Link please?

Can rafale use AMRAAM or able to integrate that new turkish BVRAAM? I think rely only on Meteor for BVR aspects is too expensive and risky for us (many people said boron based fuel in Meteor has short lifespan)

For me rafale plus are: - NATO standard, Link 16. - better design (delta canard configuration is aerodynamically better) - Newer design, has more future. - huge range of weaponry. - good range. (Rafale with 3 drop tank has better range than Flanker) - Spectra! Scalp-eg! Capability to do...

https://fb.watch/68-lUrGc2u/

US or just LM ?

Good or bad?