Well, KTJ-3200 has 1.20 kg SFC. Compared to that KTJ-1750 delivering much less thrust yet has almost same SFC.
And you are comparing an engine from 1970s with an engine from 2020s. I don't think that would be relevant.
Nope. It is more efficient and tolerate higher power input without increasing the cooling requirements. Or the same power input with less cooling requirement.
Yes, but later i discover APG-83 uses the same T/R modules as APG-81 and basically uses 95% of its technologies. Unless there are some serious limitations, it is a bit hard to believe its actual range is that short.
Anyway, with MURAD this powerful couldn't Hurjet become a cost effective...
Western companies usually uses 1m² RCS target as their range reference. But it could be 3m² or even 5m² as a fighter size target. (We can only speculate from his statement)
@TheInsider