Christos_Boumpoulis
Member
European Defence Against Strategic Nuclear Missiles
America in Danger: SARMAT with 15 Nuclear Warheads Can Wipe The Entire US East Coast
www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2M9-1GfUes
America's Nuclear Triad
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhNtYA5WvI0
The defence systems that I am designing, they are suitable, by design, to be used, specifically, by relatively small countries, for defending their freedom, mostly against a relatively larger aggressor country.
Therefore, in order for eliminating the possibility of a quantitatively asymmetric confrontation between opposing infantry, the complete exclusion of the infantry of both sides it could be imposed by employing the proposed GSAD System.
In such a case, the two countries they would had started a a quantitatively asymmetric confrontation by using, technologically advanced, missiles (both countries) and anti-missiles (the defending country.
Again, this second asymmetry is not welcomed as, the smaller country’s missiles reserves, by definition, they shall be exhausted, catastrophically, sooner than, those of the larger country.
Here is my proposal for defeating this asymmetry.
Currently, the missiles, a. they are one-time-usage (expendable) and b. they carry explosive charge.
My proposal is about, anti-aircraft and simultaneously, anti-missiles, missiles that,
1. they are reusable, (they land on wheels and/or by parachute)
2. they do not carry explosive charge
3. they shoot explosive projectiles against missiles and aircrafts
4. they are air-breathing and they can be refuelled while flying
5. from 0 to Mach 3.2 they use 2 jet engines; from 3.2 to Mach 6 they use 1 dual mode Ramjet/Scramjet engines at the Ramjet Mode; and from Mach 6 to around Mach 10 they use the Scramjet Mode.
6. the front air-intake is movable in order to support the switching from the jet-engine to the twin-Scramjets
7. for the subsonic flights, there should be two folding wings.
By using these non-expendable and very much less costly than fighter-jets, the smaller country it could exhaust the entire missiles reserves of the larger country.
There is a possibility for the larger country to employ the same technology against the smaller country.
However, the incoming, into the smaller country’s territory, reusable missiles of the larger country, they would had suffered, inability to refuel, and the proximity with ground and/or otherwise, based laser weapons.
Christos Boumpoulis
economist
America in Danger: SARMAT with 15 Nuclear Warheads Can Wipe The Entire US East Coast
www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2M9-1GfUes
America's Nuclear Triad
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhNtYA5WvI0
The defence systems that I am designing, they are suitable, by design, to be used, specifically, by relatively small countries, for defending their freedom, mostly against a relatively larger aggressor country.
Therefore, in order for eliminating the possibility of a quantitatively asymmetric confrontation between opposing infantry, the complete exclusion of the infantry of both sides it could be imposed by employing the proposed GSAD System.
In such a case, the two countries they would had started a a quantitatively asymmetric confrontation by using, technologically advanced, missiles (both countries) and anti-missiles (the defending country.
Again, this second asymmetry is not welcomed as, the smaller country’s missiles reserves, by definition, they shall be exhausted, catastrophically, sooner than, those of the larger country.
Here is my proposal for defeating this asymmetry.
Currently, the missiles, a. they are one-time-usage (expendable) and b. they carry explosive charge.
My proposal is about, anti-aircraft and simultaneously, anti-missiles, missiles that,
1. they are reusable, (they land on wheels and/or by parachute)
2. they do not carry explosive charge
3. they shoot explosive projectiles against missiles and aircrafts
4. they are air-breathing and they can be refuelled while flying
5. from 0 to Mach 3.2 they use 2 jet engines; from 3.2 to Mach 6 they use 1 dual mode Ramjet/Scramjet engines at the Ramjet Mode; and from Mach 6 to around Mach 10 they use the Scramjet Mode.
6. the front air-intake is movable in order to support the switching from the jet-engine to the twin-Scramjets
7. for the subsonic flights, there should be two folding wings.
By using these non-expendable and very much less costly than fighter-jets, the smaller country it could exhaust the entire missiles reserves of the larger country.
There is a possibility for the larger country to employ the same technology against the smaller country.
However, the incoming, into the smaller country’s territory, reusable missiles of the larger country, they would had suffered, inability to refuel, and the proximity with ground and/or otherwise, based laser weapons.
Christos Boumpoulis
economist
Last edited: