TR Foreign Policy & Geopolitics

[mehmed beg]

Islam is one hell of a drug

Just pumps out mercenaries for Arabs and destroys the host country's language and culture

I bet Jews see most Muslims as the ultimate goy

Yes , Mehmed II , Baybars , Alaudin Khiljji,Suleyman , Ulug Bey , Enver Pasha or Fevzi Cakmak were all under the influence of that drug.
I remember, a few months ago, you were dreaming of Turkifing Arabs.
I have never noticed any consistency in idea in your type of people. The only consistency is the hate for the religion that many great Turkic leaders were very devout to.
Hence as I said before, this* nationalism" is only facade.
I am sure that given the opportunity, your type will behave in the same manner as Iranian opposition.
Practically, I am waiting for " Look how it looked in the 70s".
I am religious but not really Islamist and during the years that I was in this forum, I explained myself pretty clearly and I have various ideas, but you and your type? What exactly do you stand for? Like European so called patriots, who in infantile manner look at real ancient history without understanding it? Oh , shall we talk about Yamnaya now? Like some American has any connection to that?
Or Anglo Saxons talking and the Romans? Anyone in my opinion who's a Protestant can't be truly pro European, as soon as you turn again the Roman idea , you ain't pro European. So that hybrid called Yudeo Christian culture really do exist, thank to the mindless people.
By the way, why sudden "Anti Zionism". I have never seen you express that idea in the threads dedicated to that.
I am against this so called alliance, but I can list the reasons, it is different subject to others so it would differ in context. But you or similar to you????
You have said the same thing over hundred times, no???
I get it , you hare Islam, why do you need to repeat it or is it that the only idea that you have, of course packaged in some pathetic sentimentalism?
Well, just say what happened to that idea to Turkify the Arabs and be Empire again?
Well if you want it , then some people need to die for that idea?
Pretty logical??? Or not?

 

[I_Love_F16]

I seriously wonder what type of childhood brainwashing you'd need in order to want to die for Arabs without a second thought.

I remember a post here, but forgot who posted it. Basically the post in question stated that people who believes in some sort of Muslim unity (the Ummah) don’t understand the concept of a sovereign nation with it’s own borders. They want to unit all the Muslim countries under the same umbrella, and for that to happen you’ll have to completely erase the concept of nations and borders, so in essence the state. And if you are against these view they just call you a nationalist like above.

 

[TurkWolf]

Yes , Mehmed II , Baybars , Alaudin Khiljji,Suleyman , Ulug Bey , Enver Pasha or Fevzi Cakmak were all under the influence of that drug.
I remember, a few months ago, you were dreaming of Turkifing Arabs.
I have never noticed any consistency in idea in your type of people. The only consistency is the hate for the religion that many great Turkic leaders were very devout to.
Hence as I said before, this* nationalism" is only facade.
I am sure that given the opportunity, your type will behave in the same manner as Iranian opposition.
Practically, I am waiting for " Look how it looked in the 70s".
I am religious but not really Islamist and during the years that I was in this forum, I explained myself pretty clearly and I have various ideas, but you and your type? What exactly do you stand for? Like European so called patriots, who in infantile manner look at real ancient history without understanding it? Oh , shall we talk about Yamnaya now? Like some American has any connection to that?
Or Anglo Saxons talking and the Romans? Anyone in my opinion who's a Protestant can't be truly pro European, as soon as you turn again the Roman idea , you ain't pro European. So that hybrid called Yudeo Christian culture really do exist, thank to the mindless people.
By the way, why sudden "Anti Zionism". I have never seen you express that idea in the threads dedicated to that.
I am against this so called alliance, but I can list the reasons, it is different subject to others so it would differ in context. But you or similar to you????
You have said the same thing over hundred times, no???
I get it , you hare Islam, why do you need to repeat it or is it that the only idea that you have, of course packaged in some pathetic sentimentalism?
Well, just say what happened to that idea to Turkify the Arabs and be Empire again?
Well if you want it , then some people need to die for that idea?
Pretty logical??? Or not?

Our Islamists are celebrating the fact we're about to let PKK terrorists that happen to be extremely pro Zionist by the way to walk freely in our streets. How exactly do you expect people to react to this?

They're "Islamists" "Muslims" call them whatever you want.. but they all seem to celebrate our enemies... so many will lash out and say things that might come across "xenophobic" but thats a natural reaction.

Also why do you always bring up Europeans into every argument? Why do we care if Anglos like Muslims or not. Why do we care if Europeans are this or that? I get the feeling you just hate Europeans and want an excuse to bash them .. or am I missing something?

Anyways commonalities of Islamist:

They hate Ataturk
Support PKK
Sayin APO
Turkiyeli .. Turks do not exist.
"Keske Yunan won"
Hates Azerbaijan calls them non-Turks
Osmanli torunu .. as if other Turkish dynasties empires didn't exist?

The problem is Islamist.

 

[Şok Tedavisi]

Yes , Mehmed II , Baybars , Alaudin Khiljji,Suleyman , Ulug Bey , Enver Pasha or Fevzi Cakmak were all under the influence of that drug.
I remember, a few months ago, you were dreaming of Turkifing Arabs.
I have never noticed any consistency in idea in your type of people. The only consistency is the hate for the religion that many great Turkic leaders were very devout to.
Hence as I said before, this* nationalism" is only facade.
I am sure that given the opportunity, your type will behave in the same manner as Iranian opposition.
Practically, I am waiting for " Look how it looked in the 70s".
I am religious but not really Islamist and during the years that I was in this forum, I explained myself pretty clearly and I have various ideas, but you and your type? What exactly do you stand for? Like European so called patriots, who in infantile manner look at real ancient history without understanding it? Oh , shall we talk about Yamnaya now? Like some American has any connection to that?
Or Anglo Saxons talking and the Romans? Anyone in my opinion who's a Protestant can't be truly pro European, as soon as you turn again the Roman idea , you ain't pro European. So that hybrid called Yudeo Christian culture really do exist, thank to the mindless people.
By the way, why sudden "Anti Zionism". I have never seen you express that idea in the threads dedicated to that.
I am against this so called alliance, but I can list the reasons, it is different subject to others so it would differ in context. But you or similar to you????
You have said the same thing over hundred times, no???
I get it , you hare Islam, why do you need to repeat it or is it that the only idea that you have, of course packaged in some pathetic sentimentalism?
Well, just say what happened to that idea to Turkify the Arabs and be Empire again?
Well if you want it , then some people need to die for that idea?
Pretty logical??? Or not?

Ah yes I love being educated by a bosnian about my own history and Turkish nationalism (discredits the non muslim Turkic empires), keep your ideas to yourself and bosnia not to Republic of Turkiye mate. We all know Islamism is an idea pushed by Israeli Ngos.

 

[Şok Tedavisi]

You obviously are not aware of it but in the 1980's and for most of the modern history Turks were deemed as cannon fodder. The duty of Turkiye in NATO was to hold the Soviets at our borders for just one day after which NATO would or maybe not come to our support. That was shocking when I first heard of this.

On the other hand it is understandably not just Turks fighting Greeks off that fended off all other enemies, they left themselves after achieving their goals.

@Mis_TR_Like @Tonyukuk @TurkWolf Again check this out, this guy was saying stuff like "turks did not won the war of independence but entente forces left after achieving their goals" He showed his true colors long time ago.