India Navy Frigates

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,734
Reactions
118 19,725
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
I have a gut feeling that these frigtes in end are gonna be much bigger than even Visakhapatnam class destroyers @Nilgiri

I don't think much bigger if they are bigger. Why not just call them destroyers at that point.

The heaviest FREMM/FFG-X are about Vizag displacement.

If IN wants to move frigates into 7k - 8k ton displacement and move destroyers from 8k ton - 10+k ton etc....its still frigates that would not be much bigger than Kolkata/Vizag destroyers.
 

Jammer

Active member
Messages
137
Reactions
2 134
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
While the government is tight-lipped over the DAC meeting, HT learns that Singh will also take a call on approving the construction of seven more Project 17 B stealth frigates at a cost of ₹70,000 crore. The new frigates will weigh around 8000 tonnes each and are expected to have significant strike capability.
 

Gessler

Contributor
Moderator
India Moderator
Messages
878
Reactions
39 1,973
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
While the government is tight-lipped over the DAC meeting, HT learns that Singh will also take a call on approving the construction of seven more Project 17 B stealth frigates at a cost of ₹70,000 crore. The new frigates will weigh around 8000 tonnes each and are expected to have significant strike capability.

I've read the report stating they will be displacing ~8000T.

That is significant, they'll be bigger than our current destroyers (~7500T), just as well considering rumours also state that NGD is going to be between 11-13,000T. That would be in line with how surface combatants are shaping up around the world.

I've wondered for a long time how we'll be dividing the strike roles however. Earlier we had a very multi-purpose setup for both frigates & destroyers...which led to the requirement of a dedicated ASW corvette like Kamorta class.

But we aren't considering a continuation of that role (there's no P28A) so it's possible a reassessment of the roles has been done. If we go down the same path as US/UK, it could mean future DDGs will focus on AAW & Land attack while future FFGs take care of ASW & ASuW.

That would mean P17B would have to increase its SSM load from 8 to 16-32 like on City-class. SAM load can either stay the same 32, reduce to 16 or even downgrade to VL-SRSAM instead of Barak-8 as it would only really need them for self-defence & not area-defence.

We've seen NGD renders from WESEE showing 72-144 VLS which anyway indicates a huge SAM+BMD loadout along with LACMs. With just a couple box launchers for small SSMs (maybe NASM-MR) as a last ditch offensive ASuW weapon.

But then again, we're going to induct large hypersonics that only destroyers can carry. So that LACM load may have to be swapped for a different, larger VLS to accommodate the hypersonics...unless the NGF/P17B shapes up to be able to accommodate them instead.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom