Latest Thread
@Nilgiri what you think if TATA acquires the Embraer branch which is on sale ??
Believe me, I am sure if Embraer is for sale then India should do everything possible to acquire its, as such acquisitions are of strategic value. If possible a private company's conglomerate should acquire it ( minus HAL)It will be an excellent acquisition if it happens, quoting BK blog:
Tyagi (former chairman HAL) recommends that (1) “the extant opportunity be [expeditiously] seized”, (2) “An interim Expression of Interest” be “communicated to the Government of Brazil to bid time”, and (3) “India actively considers acquiring a 51% stake into Embraer either through a SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) created by equity participation by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited acting alone or in partnership with the private sector.” Private sector participation by such Indian firms as L&T and/or Mahindra, or Godrej Aerospace makes ample sense in terms of spreading the risk and distributing the benefits, such as transfer of technology and skills, of this acquisition.
Bharat Karnad finds it unlikely though, let us see:
Embraer available, will India grab it? Nah!
[ERJ-145 — one of Embraer Company’s bestselling medium haul passenger aircraft] Twitter has been justifiably agog with the news of Dr RK Tyagi, former Chairman, HAL, writing to minister…bharatkarnad.com
Believe me, I am sure if Embraer is for sale then India should do everything possible to acquire its, as such acquisitions are of strategic value. If possible a private company's conglomerate should acquire it ( minus HAL)
Bharta Karnard seems sour like Yashwant Sinha
I read the whole article , I think only way to cut this red tspe is an Indian Private company (like land rover and jaguar deal) initiate the acquisitation with behind the scene backing of govt ....and this pendemic eill make it bit difficult for China to do the acqisitions like before , which will give some benefit to Indian companyWell his point is same as ours, it makes a whole lot of obvious sense (however the initial investment vehicle is hypothetically designed and then disseminated/refined later with time).
But his other point (of sourness) is he doesnt have much hope in the modi-team delegated for it...and I share some of that sentiment given what really should have been acquired (or helped along) by now already in 6 years of this admin if it were serious about it (w.r.t obvious sense)....given India's 2.2 trillion market cap (now approaching 3 trillion market cap)
i.e Not everyone (or even close to that level) is Gadkari-caliber or a large enough fraction of it. The results-drive needed rather than occupy-space and waffle-time that is hallmark of our bureaucracy (even the seemingly more pleasant ones).
So let us see.
I read the whole article , I think only way to cut this red tspe is an Indian Private company (like land rover and jaguar deal) initiate the acquisitation with behind the scene backing of govt ....and this pendemic eill make it bit difficult for China to do the acqisitions like before , which will give some benefit to Indian company
Missiles can attack multiple targets at the same time while lasers need lots of energy to operate and the time to attain the desired results is also longer.Missile is actually better than laser. Laser is more like guns that cannot be stopped and jammed, but it will be difficult to target a fast moving target like fighter plane by using laser.
Interesting thing is that we already have 25KW laser,never knew that.
Laser is made to target fast moving targets so your logic doesn't apply hereMissile is actually better than laser. Laser is more like guns that cannot be stopped and jammed, but it will be difficult to target a fast moving target like fighter plane by using laser.
Well DeW are certainly not lasers every time it could be emp too which can knock out multiple targets.Missiles can attack multiple targets at the same time while lasers need lots of energy to operate and the time to attain the desired results is also longer.
Missiles are the future. Lasers are useful in low-intensity conflicts that don't need a bang.