With that price it's hi possibility to get Thropy APS.$22 mil apiece
But well, K2 Is good tho
With that price it's hi possibility to get Thropy APS.$22 mil apiece
Wikipedia data:
K1A2: 6 billion won = 4.5 million USD
I said K1A2Nah its l55,
K2 arrived at Poland. what are the boxy panel on the edge of the turret? Aps radar?
Just realized its cheaper, more than half price of Qatari leos
IMO - definitely, certainly, undeniably there is a kickback involved. same goes for Indonesia's Leo's.
E.g. Singapore's Leo's (highly upgraded and enhanced former BW models) cost less then $6 million a piece. (estimates for Singapore's own enhancement efforts account to around 0.5 -1,5 million a piece, the Leo 2SG). And they are going to or already acquired some Leo 2A7's.
BTW a Leo2A7 cost's around $20-22 million.
As for a Bayraktar TB2 I am not sure, but it is around $5 million - excluding weapons and guidance control units.
AFAIK Indonesia did not. - you are citing figures of an initial deal to purchase 2nd hand Leo2A4's and Marder 1A3's in 2012 after abandoning the Netherlands deal.
Another figure in that deal was (Budget 2) US$ 280 million and later revised to US$ 320 million for the MBT Revolution - Rheinmetall Defence’s modular upgrade package for urban warfare. Not including upgrade packages for the Marder and opts-electronics, coms, etc. for the Leo.
The actual price for the 2nd hand Leo 2A4's and Marder's is not publicly available. However the (budget 1) of the initially indented purchase of Leo2A6 would have only allowed for 44 units. Take that volume 44 x $6+ million a piece and you will sum up around a $280 million budget for the purchase costs of those 2nd hand non-upgraded Leo 2A4 tanks and Marder's. How much of these (Budget 1) $280 million were actually spend, only the Indonesian government and Rheinmetall would know.
But I do know them personally and the names of the 4 main people from Rheinmetall/KMW involved in these negotiations.
2A7 cost $22 mil apiece? Dayum.
Wikipedia data:
K1A2: 6 billion won = 4.5 million USD
i think the operational cost is to high knowing it have a gas turbine engineAbrams M1A2 SEPV3 seems to be the cheaper option at about $6 mil per tank (2017 deal for US Army, CMIIW).
According to Internet tank Jesus himself the difference between diesel and turbine fuel consumption is negligible now days.i think the operational cost is to high knowing it have a gas turbine engine
The latter i supposeThis is kinda surprising.
"GDLS, the prime Abrams manufacturer, will deliver 250 M1A2 System Enhancement Program version 3 (SEPv3) Abrams tanks to the Polish army under a $1.15 billion contract"
The most advanced US Army tanks only cost $4.6 mil apiece?
Or is it because Poland donates hundreds of T-72 to Ukraine?
Poland to receive 250 advanced Abrams tanks under $1 billion contract - Breaking Defense
The award caps off a year-long effort by Poland to sign a contract for the newest version of the Abrams tank, an effort that began as Russia amassed troops on Ukraine's border.breakingdefense.com
I'm quoting Jagdflieger's post. AFAIK if an MBT has a price of less than 7 million USD (below the price of our medium tank), that means they're upgraded from second-hand stock, not newly built.
Even in the Wikipedia talk page, there's a debate about the price, since what they're quoted may not be true.
More harimau order to be build in Pindad please...
the K1A2 is only $4.5 billion cheaper than HARIMAU/KAPLAN MT the $7 billion eachWikipedia data:
K1A2: 6 billion won = 4.5 million USD
read again our discussion above, we suspect that wasn't brand new unit price.the K1A2 is only $4.5 billion cheaper than HARIMAU/KAPLAN MT the $7 billion each
I don't know which one is the newest. And Kaplan's boxy looks make that one I used more suitable artistically.
ask SoKor to put K2A1 turret on Kaplan, adjust turret ring and viola.
Usually from France
Where we get our 155 ?