U235 for max ketar-ketir effectU216, u212 cd, improved u209?
U235 for max ketar-ketir effectU216, u212 cd, improved u209?
N310 uboatU235 for max ketar-ketir effect
European NATO member who are often giving other countries new submarines design?
That is narrow them down to just German and maybe France.
Well, based on what he wrote, it's Germany then.
He said it is "new and never been existed" yet, right?
So my money is on U2, or "Achtung Baby!" Submarine.
LOA | ~ 90 m |
Pressure hull ø | ~ 8.1 m |
Surface displ. | ~ 4,000 t |
Weapon tubes | 6 |
Crew | 33 |
So what do you guys think? If it's indeed Germany's HDW/TKMS and they offer us U216 which has not been produced yet, while the SG U218 / Independence-class subs are based on it?The "not yet existed, export oriented, German made" sub is definitely U216.
I just realized that U216 actually offers Li-ion battery technology. A pleasant surprise. If we can't get the Jap's Li-ion one like Suryo/Taigei, U216 is probably the best one.
The specs from the old TKMS site (it's probably deleted now?) looks really tasty :
HDW Class 216
HDW Class 216 Submarine is a long-range multi-mission two-deck fuel cell submarine with exceptional endurance.
It features two pressure-tight compartments, high crew comfort levels and an extremely flexible payload for weapons and mission-orientated exchangeable equipment enhanced by the innovative Vertical Multi-Purpose Lock (VMPL).
- PERMASYN® propulsion technology
- Lithium-ion battery technology
- Composite propeller
- High, proven automation level
- Compact sail
- HABETaS® rescue system
The modular weapon and sensor mix, in combination with the submarine's air-independent features, makes the HDW Class 216 predestined for
- Anti-surface and anti-submarine warfare
- ISTAR - Intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition and reconnaissance
- Land attack capability
- Special Forces operations
- Deployment of unmanned vehicles
- Mine operations and mine reconnaissance.
Technical Data
LOA ~ 90 m Pressure hull ø ~ 8.1 m Surface displ. ~ 4,000 t Weapon tubes 6 Crew 33
It's quite surprising if the Germans offering us this. It's an audacious plan indeed.
source : https://web.archive.org/web/2013120...krupp-marinesystems.com/en/hdw-class-216.html
Tanda tanda McDN?2x8 cell VLS for SSM is actually for LACM
U218 sg (u214 xl) doesnt have li ion battery tech, but has aip, while u216 has li ion, u218 has multipurpose hatch in the front sect. Near torpedo sect. While 216 has multipurpose vertical sect behind the tower.I don't know much about subs, actually, so I have no idea what are the advantages and disadvantages of U216 vs U218. So if someone can provide a brief overview of them, I'll be very grateful.
Thanks. But care to explain a bit more?U218 sg (u214 xl) doesnt have li ion battery tech, but has aip, while u216 has li ion,
Sylver on AH?Tanda tanda McDN?
I am not an expert, but here my thought after after reading some articles, Li ion more compact battery so u could fill up more energy with the same size rather than conventional. While the advantage over aip, battery contain less mechanism, than aip. Less maintenance, and less sound makerThanks. But care to explain a bit more?
I know that AIP is one of the 'hot stuff' in conventional diesel-electric submarine technology, but how does it stand when compared to the Li-Ion batteries?
Whoaaa, how could we get that as non blockTomahawk combo.
this article gave simple red-line explanationThanks. But care to explain a bit more?
I know that AIP is one of the 'hot stuff' in conventional diesel-electric submarine technology, but how does it stand when compared to the Li-Ion batteries?
Thanks matethis article gave simple red-line explanation
Why is Indian Navy eyeing lithium-ion batteries for its submarines?
The Indian Navy has specified a 20-month deadline for the lithium-ion battery projectwww.theweek.in
So what do you guys think? If it's indeed Germany's HDW/TKMS and they offer us U216 which has not been produced yet, while the SG U218 / Independence-class subs are based on it?
I don't know much about subs, actually, so I have no idea what are the advantages and disadvantages of U216 vs U218. So if someone can provide a brief overview of them, I'll be very grateful.
Yes please, btw did u216 back then being offered to RAN ?U216 is one big ass motherfuck*r. It's even bigger than Suryo/Taigei, nevermind U218SG
How about buying Korean KS iii with their k-missileIf only we could somehow buy 400km Brahmos secretly, theoretically, on paper, we could send this MF to attack Beijing
What if the 2x8 cell VLS for SSM is actually for LACM, and they will reveal the Ashm, main gun, torpedoes etc later.
*Grabs popcorn.
Yes please, btw did u216 back then being offered to RAN ?
LoL back then they were defeated by NG. And now they meet again at Indo SubYes, it's competing against Barracuda (non-nuke) and Suryo.
Sylver on AH?
I am hoping for ESSM, SM-Series, Tomahawk combo. US give AU nuclear submarine at least they need to allow us to get these missile.
Whoaaa, how could we get that as non block