Replace with what?sweetener for KDX sejong class ( without SPY 1 V radar ) they offer to Navy
Latest Thread
Replace with what?sweetener for KDX sejong class ( without SPY 1 V radar ) they offer to Navy
Kosher solutions? Like on their 2nd dokdo class?Replace with what?
Type 346BReplace with what?
Better buy type 55 thenType 346B
KSAL Sudah Ajukan Modernisasi Alutsista Korps Marinir ke Kemenhan
'Ke depan, Korps Marinir harus memiliki peralatan dan persenjataan yang modern,' kata Yudo.nasional.kompas.com
I hope BTR 50 and PT 76 replacement.KSAL Has Proposed Modernization of the Marine Corps Alutsista to the Ministry of Defense
any clue what kind alutsista ?
Kosher solutions? Like on their 2nd dokdo class?
Type 346B
Again, just like fighter for our future flat deck We don't have much option here. Better start lobbying US right now!!Better buy type 55 then
Kaav / Zaha since bomerang and BMP 3 F / BT 3F / Vena doesnt found any lander also CATSAAI hope BTR 50 and PT 76 replacement.
KSAL Has Proposed Modernization of the Marine Corps Alutsista to the Ministry of Defense
any clue what kind alutsista ?
Interesting. 105 mm pandur could be the answer of PT76 replacement actually.There is planning to use amphibious APC version of Pandur II, they would get along with Army IFV version. Cost wise Pandur is quite pocket friendly
Interesting. 105 mm pandur could be the answer of PT76 replacement actually.
(105 mm version doesn't lose its amphibious capabilities right?)
Are you sure Pandur is the answer?Can't do, as far as i know. Btw, the most urgent thing is to replace those BTR50, so Pandur II apc without turret would be a logical choices.
Are you sure Pandur is the answer?
I mean pandur only has capacity half of BTR 50.
But isn't this mean our LST and LPD can only beach limited Marine infantry in one go?Logistic issue, basic user countries, cooperation between Excalibur army and Indonesia, prospect for future upgrade, costs issue and so on
But isn't this mean our LST and LPD can only beach limited Marine infantry in one go?
Its our wise thought, but its only twice in history of Marinir use what Army use regarding the armored vichele and it is the BDRM 1 and amx-10P that donated from the army inventory for marinir and they hate it ever since becouse none of them are good enough for their requirement. Do pandur does...?? Politcily and specificly fit for marinir ..??Logistic issue, basic user countries, cooperation between Excalibur army and Indonesia, prospect for future upgrade, costs issue and so on
Please explain good enough politically for marinir ?Its our wise thought, but its only twice in history of Marinir use what Army use regarding the armored vichele and it is the BDRM 1 and amx-10P that donated from the army inventory for marinir and they hate it ever since becouse none of them are good enough for their requirement. Do pandur does...?? Politcily and specificly fit for marinir ..??
There is planning to use amphibious APC version of Pandur II, they would get along with Army IFV version. Cost wise Pandur is quite pocket friendly
For APC smaller gun would suffice.Interesting. 105 mm pandur could be the answer of PT76 replacement actually.
(105 mm version doesn't lose its amphibious capabilities right?)
Yes , what i mean specificly and politically here mean strarigicly requirement fit with their deploymnet and it use or funtion of Indonesia Marine corp need them to do its job, or more less is like visi misi wich is inline with culture and tradition of Marinir.Please explain good enough politically for marinir ?