I always have a hard time in seing the logic behind critisizing one side for something but then praising the other side for the exact same thing.
Maybe I can understand your objection to the killing of a civilian. But what if an Israeli soldier was killed? After a soldier becomes a soldier, he must endure whatever happens to him. After all, they did not rape the woman. They just killed them.
Please repeat this sentence in your head again, i dont think you really think its not a big deal.
Its a retjorical question aimed to animate peoples thoughts on what exactly they are cheering for.
Why didn't you react the same way when a Palestinian woman was randomly killed on the streets of Israel? I can't imagine you giving it. If there is no problem while Palestinians are being slaughtered like sheep in the streets of Israel under state protection, then why do you remember "humanity" now?
There's like a stream of videos about this, woman shot at point blank range, children taken from their mothers in broad daylight etc. but many of the comment sections are full of people saying shit like "I fully stand with Israel" or blindly labelling people as terrorists.
Maybe you're right that they shouldn't be slaughtering civilians. But soldiers? I do not think so. In the meantime, we need to define soldier correctly. We cannot call Israelis who have weapons in the conflict zone civilians. I'm not interested in how the soldiers were killed. The people there were deprived of breathing and living a free life. In the West Bank, children are abducted by Israeli undercover police for no reason. So their actions towards the "soldiers" must be excused.
