That's not much, my posts were deleted " For the style of writing" and with the advices how I should see the things.
I can see that my statements which were not civil or objective may be counter-productive as per the purpose of the forum, I did not however identify this in my reading of the Forum Rules.
The way I see it, civility is for the civilized. Jumping through the loop-holes of people who are party to or supportive of genocide, as part of an intellectual exercise, does not make sense to me. Discussing with these Zionists, imo, is basically the equivalent of having a hifalutin philosophical debate with a Nazi German during the holocaust.
Especially, what I see on this thread is people jumping through the hoops of these zionists. They dictate conversation with their constant stream of absurdities, and people just engage in this futile cycle of attempting to refute them. It is not possible to have an objective discussion without two willing parties.
This 500 person, for example, just falls back on a prepared arsenal of talking points such that if you bring up just about any accusation against the state of Israel, he will just regurgitate some absurdity. For example, you can bring up just about any of the plethora of evidence that the state of Israel is a racist, and genocidal entity, and he will fall back on "there are Arab citizens of Israel living normal lives", as if this somehow disproves the point. It does not, it has absolutely no bearing whatsoever. Nevertheless what I observe is a successful tactic of lulling people into a process of empty conversation.
I can not be civil with someone who is an apologist for the atrocities that I have observed, perhaps that is wrong in some way. I would suggest others as well, not to partake in this kind of one-sided process of reasoning.