• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

Live Conflict Israel-US vs Iran War (2026)

Mis_TR_Like

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
1,982
Reactions
50 7,515
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Northern Cyprus
Any sane person on earth wants to topple down the Iranian regime.
The people of Iran were protesting en masse, they could've toppled the regime. But then... This war literally saved the mullahs, made them look like heroes if anything.

Let's be honest, neither Israel, nor Turkiye wants a secular, democratic, strong Iran. Mohammad Mosaddegh was the only leader who could've advanced Iran in a sustainable manner, and he was quickly removed by a US coup which put the "Shah" back in power. Despite the Shahs being despots, they actually made Iran quite strong, but they couldn't hold it together. One of the biggest criticisms of their rule was that they did everything they could to please the west. The mullahs on the other hand have stunted Iran enormously, but can be commended for their strive for more independence. But ultimately, they've done much more harm than good to their own nation.
 
Last edited:

mehmed beg

Contributor
Messages
716
Reactions
3 831
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
These things are really weird, I don't think that there is any precedent in history. Take into account new EU game via a Vis Mavi Vatan etc , I think Turkiye should be very careful and worried
After all the extinction of Turkiye as viable stat brings all parties to someone that they agree upon, including Russia
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
1,180
Reactions
11 2,150
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
The people of Iran were protesting en masse, they couldn't toppled the regime. But then... This war literally saved the mullahs, made them look like heroes if anything.

Let's be honest, neither Israel, nor Turkiye wants a secular, democratic, strong Iran. Mohammad Mosaddegh was the only leader who could've advanced Iran in a sustainable manner, and he was quickly removed by a US coup which put the "Shah" back in power. Despite the Shahs being despots, they actually made Iran quite strong, but they couldn't hold it together. One of the biggest criticisms of their rule was that they did everything they could to please the west. The mullahs on the other hand have stunted Iran enormously, but can be commended for their strive for more independence. But ultimately, they've done much more harm than good to their own nation.
I mean yes and no.
I think turkey could be interested in a democratic iran as long as its in their interest and not a lap dog of jerusalem which would be the case with that donkey pahlavi. Also under the shah iran was strong because it was allowed to be (no sanctions etc) it could have been stronger if more of the oil money was kept and not send west. The biggest issue for the mullahs was that they had no allies who could help them economically or militarily.
 

500

Contributor
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
Israel Moderator
Messages
1,161
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,317
Nation of residence
Israel
Nation of origin
Israel
The people of Iran were protesting en masse, they could've toppled the regime. But then... This war literally saved the mullahs, made them look like heroes if anything.
No, this operation started well after protests were fully suppressed.

Anyway they had not any chance from the beginning: unarmed students vs. million armed to teeth IRGC and Basij.

Let's be honest, neither Israel, nor Turkiye wants a secular, democratic, strong Iran.
Israel wants. Shah Iran before 1979 was great for Israel.
 
T

TR_123456

Guest
The people of Iran were protesting en masse, they could've toppled the regime.
Not possible,the IRGC is a 2 million men strong force armed to the teeth then there are islamist police and other instances with weapons.
They protest 20000 get killed and everyone is quiet.
Without boots on the ground all out war you cant change Iran.
 

mehmed beg

Contributor
Messages
716
Reactions
3 831
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
No, this operation started well after protests were fully suppressed.

Anyway they had not any chance from the beginning: unarmed students vs. million armed to teeth IRGC and Basij.


Israel wants. Shah Iran before 1979 was great for Israel.
Funny thing is that a ruler of some country needs to have interest of his people primarily in his mind and what I saw from Shahs interviews, he didn't like you very much.
By the way, it is obvious at least what we can see, that this fight was for Irans sovereignity. Students or others? What they fought for ? Not wearing a hejab? Is that all?
Or " opposition" asking you and Americans to totally destroy everything in Iran????
 

500

Contributor
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
Israel Moderator
Messages
1,161
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,317
Nation of residence
Israel
Nation of origin
Israel
As Jewish newspaper said. Iran wins not on battlefield but wins on negotiation table. Opposite of Turks.
Thats what Trump said.

Screenshot 2026-06-18 144901.jpg
 

500

Contributor
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
Israel Moderator
Messages
1,161
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,317
Nation of residence
Israel
Nation of origin
Israel
Funny thing is that a ruler of some country needs to have interest of his people primarily in his mind and what I saw from Shahs interviews, he didn't like you very much.
By the way, it is obvious at least what we can see, that this fight was for Irans sovereignity. Students or others? What they fought for ? Not wearing a hejab? Is that all?
Or " opposition" asking you and Americans to totally destroy everything in Iran????
Ayatulah regime failed in everything and created a sadistic police state. Before 1979 Iran GDP per capita was x2 of Turkeys's now its 1/3. Basically thanks to Ayatulas Iranians became 6 times more poor.

All money went to create dozens of Shiite militias around the Middle East, kill hundreds of thousands Syrians for sake of failed dictator Assad.
 

NEKO

Experienced member
Indonesia Correspondent
Messages
3,547
Reactions
5 3,229
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia

White House released full text of the MoU

The points summarised are as follows:

1. The U.S. and Iran, and their allies in the current war, by signing this MoU, declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other, and to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other, and ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon.

2. The U.S. and Iran will respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity and refrain from interfering in each other's internal affairs.

3. The U.S. and Iran commit to achieving a final deal in a maximum of 60 days, extendable with mutual consent.

4. The U.S. will immediately begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, the traffic will be in proportion to the number of pre-war traffic being restored by Iran. The U.S. further undertakes to remove its military forces from the proximity of Iran within 30 days after the final deal.

5. Iran will make arrangements for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman, and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles and demining, within 30 days. Iran will conduct a dialogue with Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz in discussion with other Persian Gulf littoral states in line with international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz. (My comment: So they're free to charge a toll for any future traffic as long as they call it something else, like a 'service fee')

6. The U.S. undertakes with its regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least USD 300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of Iran, as part of the final deal after 60 days. All required licenses, waivers, and permissions will be granted. (My comment: Essentially, the US agrees to pay war reparations.)

7. The U.S. will terminate all types of sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the UNSC resolutions, IAEA Board of Governors resolutions, and all unilateral US sanctions, primary and secondary, in an agreed-upon schedule as part of the final deal.

8. Iran reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons. The U.S. and Iran have agreed to resolve the disposition of stockpile enriched materials, pursuant to a mechanism that will be mutually agreed upon in accordance with the schedule mentioned in paragraph seven, with at a minimum a downblending on site under the supervision of the IAEA. The two parties also agreed to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed matters related to Iran's nuclear needs. (My comment: Iran has never publicly said that they seek nuclear weapons, so no change there. The 60% enriched U will be downblended into more civilian-grade 5-7% enriched state, but the wording of the last line seems to indicate Iran will be allowed to keep their enrichment infrastructure as long as they promise not to enrich beyond the 5-7% mark).

9. Pending the final deal, the U.S. and Iran agree to maintain the status quo. Iran will maintain the current status quo of its nuclear program, and the U.S. will not impose any new sanctions and will not deploy additional forces in the region.

10. The U.S. undertakes that immediately upon the signing of this MoU, waivers will be issued for the export of Iranian crude oil, petroleum products, and derivatives, and all associated services, including banking transactions, insurances, transportation, etc.

11. The U.S. undertakes to make fully available for use the frozen or restricted funds of the Islamic Republic of Iran upon the implementation of this MoU. The U.S. and Iran will mutually agree on the procedures related to the release of these funds during the negotiations.

12. A monitoring mechanism will be established to supervise the implementation of this MoU and the subsequent deal.

13. After signing this MoU and subject to the beginning of the implementation of paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 10, and 11, and the continuing implementation of these measures, the U.S. and Iran will start negotiations regarding the final deal.

14. The final deal will be endorsed by a UNSC Resolution.

====

Wow, total & complete surrender of American interest in the region, in return for what is essentially status quo ante bellum, how it was before the war.

One of the most pathetic defeats suffered by the US yet. Way worse than the Vietnam withdrawal.

And Trump had to sign this surrender document in Versailles of all places! :ROFLMAO:
What did the US even accomplish with this unnecessary war.

Operation Epic Fail.
 

mehmed beg

Contributor
Messages
716
Reactions
3 831
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Ayatulah regime failed in everything and created a sadistic police state. Before 1979 Iran GDP per capita was x2 of Turkeys's now its 1/3. Basically thanks to Ayatulas Iranians became 6 times more poor.

All money went to create dozens of Shiite militias around the Middle East, kill hundreds of thousands Syrians for sake of failed dictator Assad.
What is that to you? I don't see how such thing is related to Jewery?
You killed millions in USSR, no? You killed Palestinians , in fact every opportunity that you got, you massacred all around you. Even in Anti Roman appraisings, you planed and wrote even before ww2 to annihilate German Nation.
And yes , I think according to the book , I think if Syrian general Tlas , you got Golan for the Alawaits to get the power.Why wouldn't you even Bashars grandfather was begging Present of Fray, a Jew called Blom " Not to let Arabs and Sunnies take over" , that letter is well known.
You made few quid from the Mullahs and don't be uncharitable towards your ex business partners . You yourself bragged here how Israel was helping the Mullahs big time during Iran Iraq war. What has changed?
 

Corvus

Committed member
Messages
284
Reactions
8 588
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Israel wants. Shah Iran before 1979 was great for Israel.
Of course, a secular (and maybe democratic) Iran would mean the end of Hezbollah, Houthis and Iraqi PMU. They would form an alliance with Israel to counter Arab countries and Türkiye.
 

500

Contributor
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
Israel Moderator
Messages
1,161
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,317
Nation of residence
Israel
Nation of origin
Israel
Operation Midnight Hammer??
Midnight Hammer was in the very end, after Israel took out Iranian air defence alone, took out their generals, hundreds of IRGC officers, carried thousands of strikes on military sites.

Unlimited air defence support????
Unlimited is very big word. Two batteries of THAAD is not something critical.
 

Corvus

Committed member
Messages
284
Reactions
8 588
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Unlimited is very big word. Two batteries of THAAD is not something critical.
As I said before, I enjoy when I see how out of touch you are with reality. I hope all the Israelis have similar views about "very limited" American protection of their statelet.
 

500

Contributor
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
Israel Moderator
Messages
1,161
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,317
Nation of residence
Israel
Nation of origin
Israel
During the war Iran suffered hundreds of billion losses.

Now lets see what they actually get:

1) Waivers for oil export.

Well they were exporting it anyway to China, Turkiye, India but with discount. Now they can sell without discount theoretically.

2) Frozen assets (about 80 bln). Guess who holds these frozen assets? - China and Iraq. I don't think they will rush to release these assets +the MOU says that releasing freezing assets depends on negotiations.

So screams about great Iranian victory are a little exaggeration.
 

500

Contributor
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
Israel Moderator
Messages
1,161
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,317
Nation of residence
Israel
Nation of origin
Israel
As I said before, I enjoy when I see how out of touch you are with reality. I hope all the Israelis have similar views about "very limited" American protection of their statelet.
Basically everything beside the Fordow was done by Israel (Israel simply lacks such bombs).

In defence Israel would suffer more damage but not something critical. Lets say even twice: 60 civilians killed instead of 30.

Also Israel's two greatest victories (1948 and 1967) Israel carried totally alone.
 
Top Bottom