Latest Thread
Why it is the worst bid?Congrats Malaysia for selecting the worse bid. Hürjet would give them both more flexible configuration options and higher Malaysian industry participation.
Why it is the worst bid?
Technically it is the best solution out there as it is a proven platform and already in service with multiple air forces.
However, considering political aspect and the local industry participation Hurjet would've been a better choice.
But it is their airforce and they knows better.
This video is from a popular Korean cooking show 백패커 (baekpaekeo/ The Backpacker Chef)View attachment 70943 View attachment 70944 View attachment 70945 View attachment 70946
The KAI production line was shown in a Korean TV show. The T-50/FA-50 line is running non-stop, and it's been a while since we've seen news about the T-50i. I think it was filmed in August.
I hope the government implements the proposed MLU plan. They‘re cheaping out on long-term defense R&D and upgrading outdated inventory through all branches.KAI's T/FA-50 MLU Proposal announced in 2022. It was not officially created by the South Korean Ministry of Defense.
View attachment 71034
The T-50 family of aircraft has been in service for 18 years since it was first delivered to the Air Force and will reach mid-life (20 years) in 2025.
View attachment 71035
Why does the T/FA-50 require an MLU? In the meantime, aircraft components (IMDC, HUD, FLCC, CMFD, etc.) are being sourced overseas and manufacturers are discontinuing them. Last Time Buy (LTB) components are already reaching their limits.
View attachment 71036
Older avionics systems make it difficult to train pilots for the upcoming modernization of fourth and fifth generation fighters, which will lead to additional missions for combat squadrons and increased training costs, as combat units will have to designate fighters to complete limited tactical course training on trainers. Therefore, it is necessary to upgrade to the latest Avionics system and introduce a Embedded training system to fulfill the tactical training mission.
View attachment 71037
The FA-50, a light fighter, has the same problem. The L/M version of the AIM-9 series, the main weapon, has been discontinued, and the AGM-65 is too old to be used in the current battlefield. There is also the problem of the mission computer mentioned above, and the radar required for the future battlefield needs to be applied. Sensor pods for precision strikes, external fuel tanks to increase the mission radius, aerial refueling capabilities, and rear fuselage modifications are ways to improve this. It should also be capable of carrying Korean short- and medium-range air-to-air missiles, which were developed in the 30s.
View attachment 71038
View attachment 71039
This is the part that points out that overseas countries legislate the performance improvement cycle of the aircraft in operation and start the business when that time is reached, while Korea does not. In the end, the KT-1 missed the time for MLU and had to promote new development, and the T/FA-50 still has a chance, so we should not miss this time and promote MLU.
View attachment 71041
This part analyzes the requirements for improvements to the T/FA-50 by analyzing requirements from the KF-16 and the APT T-X program, a U.S. Air Force advanced training aircraft program. The KF-16 was upgraded to improve survivability, requiring protective equipment such as RWR/CMDS, GCAS, PARS, and TF, and to extend the life of the aircraft by modernizing aviation avionics, overhauling and reinforcing the airframe, while the APT T-X's requirements include aerial refueling capability, LAD, SFI, and integration of embedded training system capabilities.
View attachment 71040
Therefore, KAI proposed a plan to integrate aviation avionics, FLCC, and embedded training systems in common with T/FA-50 to improve internal fuel expansion of the 300G/L external fuel tank integrated fuselage for mission radius expansion, gas life extension, GCAS, TCAS, PARS, and individually apply specific performance improvement factors.
View attachment 71042 View attachment 71043 View attachment 71044 View attachment 71045
This is a detailed shape for each performance improvement element. I think it will be understandable just by looking at the picture without having to explain it separately.
The T/FA-50s exported to overseas countries will also need to be MLU, so I think we should proceed with the plan next year or the next few years. First, we need to have our own IMDC so that we can integrate domestic air-to-air missiles in the future... We have already integrated ROTS (MDS tech) into an IMDC made by Intelics in 2007 and successfully flew it. However, I think we will not use it for future MLUs, but will make a new one and integrate it.I hope the government implements the proposed MLU plan. They‘re cheaping out on long-term defense R&D and upgrading outdated inventory through all branches.
Army and Marine Corps were always cash-strapped stingy but Air Force and Navy have to keep up with intense Chinese & Japanese arms race lately.
Exported T-50 variants are still a decade away to reach MLU age, besides Indonesia, Iraq, Thai or Philippines don‘t yet have budgets reserved for upgrades. They‘ll fly the old ones til they fall from the sky and order small batches of newer models right away.The T/FA-50s exported to overseas countries will also need to be MLU, so I think we should proceed with the plan next year or the next few years. First, we need to have our own IMDC so that we can integrate domestic air-to-air missiles in the future... We have already integrated ROTS (MDS tech) into an IMDC made by Intelics in 2007 and successfully flew it. However, I think we will not use it for future MLUs, but will make a new one and integrate it.
View attachment 71053 View attachment 71054
View attachment 71051