Live Conflict Military Operations Syria

Strong AI

Contributor
Messages
1,091
Reactions
36 4,423
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
The National Intelligence Organization (MİT) identified that the PKK/YPG terrorist group, which is trying to seize land and take advantage of the developments in Syria, had started to smuggle missiles, heavy weapons, and ammunition left behind by the Assad regime in Qamishli. MİT quickly acted and launched an operation.

After the end of the Assad regime, MİT had been carefully monitoring the developments in the region through field agents. The organization discovered that the terrorist group had seized missiles, ammunition, heavy weapons, and tanks from the regime as part of their dirty agreements with the Assad regime, and had started moving these weapons to their own warehouses. The group intended to use the military equipment and supplies stolen from the Syrian people against our security forces.

MİT, which was closely monitoring the region, detected that the terrorists were loading missiles and ammunition onto trucks under the cover of darkness and leaving the area in convoy. Following this, MİT decided to launch an operation, destroying 12 trucks loaded with missiles and heavy weapons, 2 tanks, and 2 ammunition depots.

With the morale of the terrorist group completely shattered by the recent operations in Syria, they began spreading the lie that "the Kamishli Airport was targeted by Israel, and there was no operation against the group." This was an attempt to reduce the intense fear among their cadres, who had been cornered on the east side of the Euphrates River.

According to MİT sources, the current situation in Syria means that any terrorist group nesting near our borders and conducting activities against our country will not be tolerated, and operations against the terrorist group will continue.

 

Iskander

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
525
Reactions
11 1,478
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
After Israel, Uncle Sam has an appetite too.

The Russian naval base in Tartus should be replaced by a US naval base in the same location, suggests American Middle East scholar Michael Rubin on 19FortyFive.
The majority of Syrian Alawites live in Latakia, a region of Syria along the Mediterranean coast. […] And it is no coincidence that Latakia is home to the Russian naval base in Tartus. Although Russian President Vladimir Putin says that Russian ships are still in Tartus, reports from Syria indicate that the Russians are leaving, Rubin writes.

The upheaval in Syria opens up new opportunities for the United States. Rubin further suggests that “the Alawites’ main interest is survival, not participation in Iran’s Axis of Resistance or an alliance with Putin.”

Trump should offer a deal: The United States will support Alawite autonomy in Latakia. […] And the US Navy will be ready to protect them with its aircraft if Syrian Sunni forces try to advance into the region. In exchange, the US will take control of the Russian naval base in Tartus
– Mr. Rubin expressed his thoughts.
The author does not stop there. He suggests that by occupying Tartus, the US will achieve several goals at once.
This includes pushing Russia out of the Mediterranean Sea into the Black Sea, where the Russian fleet will immediately become vulnerable to attacks from Ukraine, and a threat to obstinate Turkey , - queted the russian «Reporter»
 

No Name

Well-known member
Messages
408
Reactions
6 434
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Afghanistan
This includes pushing Russia out of the Mediterranean Sea into the Black Sea, where the Russian fleet will immediately become vulnerable to attacks from Ukraine, and a threat to obstinate Turkey , - queted the russian «Reporter»
Is this real because it is extremely stupid? For one thing, how will it push the Russian fleet into the Black Sea? The only gateway to the black sea is closed.

A naval base in Tartus will also be within range of Turkey's weapons systems, so not really a good place to put a navel base if you are tring to threaten Turkey.
 

Ryder

Experienced member
Messages
10,908
Reactions
7 18,831
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Turkey
After Israel, Uncle Sam has an appetite too.

The Russian naval base in Tartus should be replaced by a US naval base in the same location, suggests American Middle East scholar Michael Rubin on 19FortyFive.
The majority of Syrian Alawites live in Latakia, a region of Syria along the Mediterranean coast. […] And it is no coincidence that Latakia is home to the Russian naval base in Tartus. Although Russian President Vladimir Putin says that Russian ships are still in Tartus, reports from Syria indicate that the Russians are leaving, Rubin writes.

The upheaval in Syria opens up new opportunities for the United States. Rubin further suggests that “the Alawites’ main interest is survival, not participation in Iran’s Axis of Resistance or an alliance with Putin.”

Trump should offer a deal: The United States will support Alawite autonomy in Latakia. […] And the US Navy will be ready to protect them with its aircraft if Syrian Sunni forces try to advance into the region. In exchange, the US will take control of the Russian naval base in Tartus
– Mr. Rubin expressed his thoughts.
The author does not stop there. He suggests that by occupying Tartus, the US will achieve several goals at once.
This includes pushing Russia out of the Mediterranean Sea into the Black Sea, where the Russian fleet will immediately become vulnerable to attacks from Ukraine, and a threat to obstinate Turkey , - queted the russian «Reporter»

Zionists want the USA and the Turkish republic to clash.

Israel is a trojan horse for Nato. Despite not being a nato member.
 

ADMusa

Active member
Messages
41
Reactions
64
Nation of residence
Nigeria
Nation of origin
Nigeria
After Israel, Uncle Sam has an appetite too.

The Russian naval base in Tartus should be replaced by a US naval base in the same location, suggests American Middle East scholar Michael Rubin on 19FortyFive.
The majority of Syrian Alawites live in Latakia, a region of Syria along the Mediterranean coast. […] And it is no coincidence that Latakia is home to the Russian naval base in Tartus. Although Russian President Vladimir Putin says that Russian ships are still in Tartus, reports from Syria indicate that the Russians are leaving, Rubin writes.

The upheaval in Syria opens up new opportunities for the United States. Rubin further suggests that “the Alawites’ main interest is survival, not participation in Iran’s Axis of Resistance or an alliance with Putin.”

Trump should offer a deal: The United States will support Alawite autonomy in Latakia. […] And the US Navy will be ready to protect them with its aircraft if Syrian Sunni forces try to advance into the region. In exchange, the US will take control of the Russian naval base in Tartus
– Mr. Rubin expressed his thoughts.
The author does not stop there. He suggests that by occupying Tartus, the US will achieve several goals at once.
This includes pushing Russia out of the Mediterranean Sea into the Black Sea, where the Russian fleet will immediately become vulnerable to attacks from Ukraine, and a threat to obstinate Turkey , - queted the russian «Reporter»
the US means trouble for Syria. it is there primarily to prevent democracy from flourishing in the country. the US should leave Syria like Russia did. They must not be allowed to achieve any counter-revolution goals like they did in Egypt, Tunisia, and are attempting to do in Libya and Sudan. I've written a few posts about the future of Syria after Assad. Anyone can find them at threatwatchers.org
 

ADMusa

Active member
Messages
41
Reactions
64
Nation of residence
Nigeria
Nation of origin
Nigeria
Is this real because it is extremely stupid? For one thing, how will it push the Russian fleet into the Black Sea? The only gateway to the black sea is closed.

A naval base in Tartus will also be within range of Turkey's weapons systems, so not really a good place to put a navel base if you are tring to threaten Turkey.
The US is currently Turkiye's biggest threat.
 

Tabmachine

Active member
Messages
91
Reactions
131
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Pakistan
the US means trouble for Syria. it is there primarily to prevent democracy from flourishing in the country. the US should leave Syria like Russia did. They must not be allowed to achieve any counter-revolution goals like they did in Egypt, Tunisia, and are attempting to do in Libya and Sudan. I've written a few posts about the future of Syria after Assad. Anyone can find them at threatwatchers.org
really enjoyed the read there on your website. Thanks!
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,704
Reactions
37 19,882
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yes, the faster we move and react and give the arab tribes reason to stand against PKK/YPG the faster we can get rid of the terrorist organization.
 

Strong AI

Contributor
Messages
1,091
Reactions
36 4,423
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
They are changing flags like underwear.

On the occasion of the victory of the will of the Syrians and the overthrow of the oppressive regime, the Democratic Peoples' Council decided to raise the flag of independence on all institutions of the democratic self-administration in the region of North and East Syria, affirming the unity of Syria and its national identity.

 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,704
Reactions
37 19,882
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yes, just saw the post in the other thread :)

But we need to move fast and hard, we can only hope the populations pressure can make US leave the bases, but that will only happen if SNA gets to those areas and controls them.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom