I think the admin changed my nationality because posting as a Ukrainian with pro-Russian posts probably pissed alot of people off here where he got alot of complaints from users i think from it
The Burevestnik looks like the Kh-59MK2 , or i'm mistaken ?This will pretty much give an overview of what nuclear weapon projects are publicly known and the roles that they will play.
Yars
Yars has a between 11,000kms to 12,000kms maneuvers from the start to end phase by not following a traditional ICBM path but controlled thrust vectors which make it easier to use for liquid fuel than solid fuel rockets. Options for warheads are 3-6 MIRVs with 300-500 kiloton warheads or 6 to 9 150 kiloton warheads. Yars-S is a modernization approval over the existing Yars. The missiles also carry targeting countermeasures and decoys, about 136+ mobile versions and 16 silo versions have been made.
Barguzin
Based on picture the explanation is pretty straight forward, 3 missiles based on the Bulava missile are attached to one of the high-speed train trailers. They will be A.I controlled and choose random different paths, go underground, etc, to throw off adversaries monitoring their weapons via satellite.
Cedar
Yars was a replacement for Topol and Cedar is a replacement for Yars not much is known other than being more advanced than Yars. Creation of missile will begin in 2023-2024.
Sarmat
The most powerful nuclear weapon in their arsenal that carries 10-15 MIRVs with unspecified amount of Avangards which I will discuss after this missile, I am assuming the blast yjelds will be equivalent to Satan missile. But as what I would expect the missile has many countermeasures implemented before reaching its target and the 1st is using the Mozyr active protection system around its silos which fire projectiles at a 6km altitude against cruise missiles, bombs, warheads. 2nd what i heard from other sources is that it uses detonation engines which accelerate faster than conventional 1st stage engines used which reduces the tracking time to intercept them. 3rd the 18,000km range allows it to travel or rather fly a trajectory through the south pole which states makes the missile immune from air defenses trying to hit it which I guess is due to powerful X-rays from solar flare radiation from the south pole and has a FOB capability of deploying warheads at low altitudes to travel to its intended targets.
Avangard
The Avangard is a hypersonic glide vehicle that based on different claims has speeds of mach 20 to mach 27. It gets released at an altitude of 100kms being carried from a missile and makes the rest of its 6000km + range to its target with a 2-megaton payload. So, what makes the HGV difficult to intercept is its lower altitude flight than ballistic missile flight ceilings, maneuverability and speed which I am guessing gives it plasma properties stronger than the Zircon missile giving radars a difficult time to track it. About 8 Avangards are in service but equipped in UR-100 missiles. Russians have created new materials that can burn up to 4200 degrees Celsius which can give them more hypersonic projects to work with on faster speeds and lower altitudes.
Burevestnik
I would like to call this a 3rd strike nuclear weapons because after all the high-speed nuclear missiles are exchanged this subsonic low flying missile will have an unlimited flight range (depending how long miniature nuclear engines last) just looking for survivors and it will be A.I. controlled. It will use radar horizon to fly low and avoid any air defenses assuming if there are any that will still function.
Poseidon
An AI torpedo with a 10,000km range, 1km depth and high-speed underwater nuclear warheads that can be launched from one their submarines like Belgorod to destroy cities either physically by hitting the coasts or according to other arguments and online articles depending on payloads and depths, cause radioactive tsunamis.
This pretty much covers their nuclear weapons and their other nuclear weapons have been discussed earlier in other articles from their navy, army and air force.
References
1. About engines for intercontinental ballistic missiles (topwar.ru)
2.Mike Mihajlovic on Twitter: "The head of Roskosmos, Dmitry Rogozin, announced work in the direction of a new type of ballistic missile from railway platforms. The new missile is based on RSM-56 Bulava submarine-launched missile. https://t.co/syxJKHBiuw" / Twitter
3. 4200 degrees Celsius: Russian scientists have created the most refractory material in the world – RT on Russian
they are different.
Oh it is , thank you for the clarification
Hello Kamran Shehxad. If Putin says he is going to place Nuclear weapons on Belarusian soil, you can "take that to the bank"! It will happen given the mentality of Russia's so called "Head of State" no matter what the West thinks or the people of Belarus say. After all, Belarus is not a free society with a free minded President. It is a Russian protectorate that will yield to whatever Putin says in the end. "The Dooms-day Clock is now ticking a little closer to midnight!
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko recently made headlines when he called for Russia to station nuclear weapons in Belarus, arguing that it would provide greater security for both countries in the face of perceived threats from NATO and other Western powers. This controversial proposal has been met with both support and condemnation from politicians, experts, and citizens around the world.
The idea of Russian nuclear weapons being stationed in Belarus is not a new one; in fact, it has been discussed for many years. Lukashenko's recent comments, however, have brought the issue back to the forefront of global discourse. The Belarusian president has argued that such a move would be necessary to deter potential aggressors, particularly in light of the ongoing conflict in neighboring Ukraine.
Belarus has long been a strategic buffer zone between Russia and NATO, and Lukashenko has sought to maintain a delicate balance between the two. However, in recent years, tensions have increased between Belarus and the West, particularly following Lukashenko's controversial re-election in 2020, which was widely criticized as fraudulent.
Since then, Lukashenko has cracked down on opposition voices and civil society, leading to international condemnation and economic sanctions from the West. In response, Lukashenko has turned to Russia for support, and the two countries have strengthened their military and economic ties.
However, Lukashenko's proposal to station Russian nuclear weapons in Belarus has raised concerns both within the country and abroad. Some experts argue that it would make Belarus a target for attack in the event of a conflict, while others worry that it could lead to a new arms race in Europe and further destabilize the region.
Moreover, the proposal has raised questions about the effectiveness of nuclear weapons as a deterrent, particularly in light of recent technological advancements in conventional warfare. Many experts argue that the use of nuclear weapons would be catastrophic and that there are more effective ways to ensure national security.
In addition to the security implications, the proposal has also raised questions about the legality of such a move. Belarus is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which prohibits the transfer of nuclear weapons to non-nuclear states. While Lukashenko has argued that the proposed move would not violate this treaty, it remains a contentious issue.
Furthermore, the proposal has drawn attention to the broader geopolitical landscape of Europe and the role of Belarus in it. The country's strategic location between Russia and NATO has long been a source of tension, and Lukashenko's proposal has only added to the uncertainty.
In conclusion, while the idea of stationing Russian nuclear weapons in Belarus may seem like a logical move from a security perspective, it raises significant concerns and poses many unanswered questions. It is unclear whether such a move would actually enhance national security, and it could have potentially disastrous consequences for the region and the world as a whole. As such, it is important that all parties involved carefully consider the implications of this proposal before making any decisions.
