TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

Saithan · Sep 14, 2021

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1437749595535298560

Atmaca mass production qualification tests over, count down to enter inventory has begun

Siper>MMU · Sep 15, 2021

Som-J launch tests are started. 0:26

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1438132250231586827

Combat-Master · Sep 15, 2021

Aselsan SDB

Anmdt · Sep 15, 2021

Combat-Master said:
Aselsan SDB
View attachment 31213

What is better than one? two, and three even four

Combat-Master · Sep 15, 2021

Anmdt said:
What is better than one? two, and three even four

Yeah but, one 500kg warhead coulda wiped out all four bunkers in one go

Bogeyman · Sep 15, 2021

boracetkin said:
Som-J launch tests are started. 0:26

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1438132250231586827

SARB-83 test video is not real, it's animation guys

Lonewolf · Sep 15, 2021

TheInsider said:
There is a big problem with ramjet missiles. Their flight time is a lot longer compared to solid rockets. This means you have to feed updated target coordinates to the missile for a long time until the terminal engagement where the active RF seeker of the missile picks its target. This is one of the reasons why the US choose not to go for Ramjet missiles.

Aesa can solve your issue , nez of meteor is said to be 90 km or more. For aim 120 d etc it's 60 km .

Aesa seeker can detect 0.1 m^2 target at 10-15 km , that's f 35 size almost , so those 4 th gen will be visible at 50 km or so at max due to limitations of wave lobe , so you can easily guide it ,not a issue

Elaser · Sep 15, 2021

Lonewolf said:
ez of meteor is said to be 90 km or more

Source?

Lonewolf · Sep 15, 2021

Elaser said:
Source?

It's been said in statement that next of meteor is three times aim120 b ,which has about 30 km or so next , one guy did some basic physics to show the various factors involved .

The above figure I gave is at 10 kilometer above sea level