TR Naval Programs

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,066
Solutions
1
Reactions
34 14,482
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
This is not a test. Neither an official test where SSB or DzKK is present nor a factory test. This is a stunt for the media.
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,066
Solutions
1
Reactions
34 14,482
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
There are 48 Cells btw behind the main mast. You can make out the third row


View attachment 66113

So 32 Cells in the front and 48 Cells behind the main mast.

Wouldn’t say adding 16 more Cells gonna save cost but what do I know.
No there are 64 cells. There should be a fourth row behind the mast.

tf2000kırp.jpg
 
Last edited:

Khagan1923

Contributor
Messages
981
Reactions
14 4,180
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Putting 16 cells instead of 16 side launchers might make it more compact
Would add costs though to integrate Atmaca into it. So again doesn’t seem to reduce cost.

Gonna guess the current setup has its reason future planning wise instead of the Navy going, „ let’s cut costs“.
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
937
Reactions
13 1,535
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Would add costs though to integrate Atmaca into it. So again doesn’t seem to reduce cost.

Gonna guess the current setup has its reason future planning wise instead of the Navy going, „ let’s cut costs“.
You also need those cells for Gezgin don't you
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,066
Solutions
1
Reactions
34 14,482
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
There are three rows of 16 cells in that picture so either the navy made a mistake or it’s 80 Cells.
There should be a fourth row we can't see it from this perspective because of the main mast.

Ok, I'm terrible at paint but this should give some perspective.

tf2000kırp.jpg
 
Last edited:

BalkanTurk90

Contributor
Messages
658
Reactions
5 1,028
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
🔴🇹🇷In the last shared design of TF-2000, there are differences in the ÇAFRAD sequence.
🔸3 different (UMR, AYR, ÇFR) radar arrays consisting of 4 fixed faces have changed in the new design.
🔸While UMR maintains its place on the ship, the AYR sequence above it is not included on the ship.

Where are Atmaca lunchers? Will they aslo lunch them from VLS ? 🤔🤔
 

BalkanTurk90

Contributor
Messages
658
Reactions
5 1,028
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
Nope total 96 cells. 32x in the front and 64x in the middle.
I dont think so , if they made it shorter at 149 meter and looking at image , this is 48 vls middle and 32 at front (80 total)
I dont like that they make it shorter. A destroyer at least should be 150 meter . Other japan and s Korea navies are building 15000 ton destroyers .
They must build 155 meter and 48 x 48 VLS 😡
 

Chocopie

Contributor
South Korea Correspondent
Messages
634
Reactions
35 2,277
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
South Korea
I dont think so , if they made it shorter at 149 meter and looking at image , this is 48 vls middle and 32 at front (80 total)
I dont like that they make it shorter. A destroyer at least should be 150 meter . Other japan and s Korea navies are building 15000 ton destroyers .
They must build 155 meter and 48 x 48 VLS 😡
Major East Asian guided missile „destroyers“ from JP, KOR, CN are cruisers in size >10,000+ t displacement.
 
Last edited:

Kaan Azman 

Well-known member
DH Visual Specialist
Messages
424
Reactions
26 1,748
Age
22
Website
twitter.com
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Since MİLDEN will come somewhat late, we should consider short-range SLBM capability with TAYFUN. Either a larger MİDLAS or a smaller TAYFUN missile.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom