Osur osur diz ip'e.I don’t know if he’s just throwing things or if there are actual considerations?
A Turkish proverb, nonetheless - simply 'bullshit'.
These people don't have grasp of reality.
Dear members; there is no practical possibility of aircraft carrier being fully operational earlier than 2035, let alone 'studying a nuclear aircraft carrier past 2030'.
United Kingdom, who also operates nuclear subs and capable of the aforementioned technological readiness level for deploying the system, has not adopted nuclear propulsion for the aircraft carrier. Turkish Navy also studied alternative propulsions for the aircraft carrier and concluded that, in a foreseeable future (which is 2040s) the Navy does not require to operate a nuclear aircraft carrier - yet surely needs a nuclear powered submarine.
All in all, making an aircraft carrier does not magically make it a global power projection unit, you need at least two of these since overhaul of nuclear propulsion may take two years, and moreover, you still need to replenish these ships and the crew. You don't magically unlock multi-year unrestricted deployments through the nucler propulsion, you still replenish the water, food and other maintenance units and spares for subsystems.
These people who lack basic understanding of what a ship is, and what the operational aspects of a flotilla, keeps making up this bullshit - for what they are being funded through alternative channel, and to gain sympathy of someone among the high-ups, and to gain 'followers'. I pity them, therefore i highly suggest to not refer to these in 'news' page. They are simply not reliable source.