The same logic must be applied to the Russian strategic technology.
We shot their fighter jet in 2015 (in the same period their officers were hunted like flies in the Turkmen Mountain by our assets), in 2016 a Russian supplied MANPADS to PKK shot down a Turkish AH-1W Cobra helicopter in Turkiye, in 2017 during the Operation Euphrates Shield a Russian TU-22 "mistakenly" bombed a building in which Turkish Special Forces were stationed resulting in 3 martyrs and 11 wounded, in 2020 a Russian SU-34s bombed a Turkish convoy in Balyun, Syria resulting in the martyrdom of more than 30 Turkish soldiers and tens of wounded.
What is happening today? Terrorists under Russian protection are targeting our assets and soldiers in Syria daily and resulted in tens of martyrs both from our soldiers, but also from our law enforcement personnel. One of the main reasons for them not to take Kiev are Turkish supplied drones, we effectively pushed them out of Karabakh and their peace keepers died in result of the steel punch of our Azerbaijani brothers. And this is only a part of the whole situation.
Just yesterday a Russian supplied FPV drone, launched from Russian protected area hit the dirt obstacles in the vicinity of our base in Kastun, Syria.
On who we can rely for strategic support?
EDIT: A Russian supplied FPV drone was directly used against the TSK base in Kansafra today...
ruzzia is not you Ally, by any offical document! I do not understand what you compare ruzzian with usa?
Turkiye does not have any obligation or expectations from ruzzia. It is Pure temporary agreements dependent from situtation.
usa on other hand is ally
usa have obligations to Turkiye and vas versa
usa have bases and troops on Turkiye territory
etc.............................
So my logic is on Facts and Current reality -> It mean that you can be naive and please usa. Or you can use all of the facts which happend when you seat on table with usa.
No more pleasing. Just behave as you behave with ruzzia. Short agreements you do that I do that for all (even for small details).
As for long agreement DO NOT expect to be happening from usa. They prove that they do not fulfil there part.
That is why long therm agreement with usa on strategic assets is NOT Feasible.
It is time Turkiye to align with current usa policy. It mean that usa are hostile stand against Turkiye, if there are diplomacy requests Turkiye should ask usa to fullfil FIRST thier side of agreement then Turkiye.
The only think which we see here is that what ever is the event/case usa keep demanding from Turkiye!
usa hostility actions and they demanding!? usa lost hard build up relationship on mutual trust. In persent days there is nothing!
NATO offical contract is there, YES. But usa is siding with ruzzia aginst Turkiye. usa is siding with PKK against Turkiye. As I said above, the list is long...........
Do not make this list bigger by you own choice relying on usa! With current usa policy you asking to be F...d